480Y/277V (WYE) Service Entrance to 480V Delta Transformer -- Final Thread

AsparkyBOI

Member
Location
Rock Island, IL
Occupation
Electrical Engineer
Hello all,

This is my first post here. I wanted to start off by saying thank you for the treasure trove of electrical information that has helped guide and elucidate me through several jobs over the years.

I'm an electrical engineer, and my team has a project where the customer wants several thousand amps of 208Y/120V electrical service. To save hassle with the electric utility, we are hoping to have this served by a 480V service and step the voltage down to 208Y/120V to serve the customer's loads. According to the POCO's service manual, only 480Y/277V is available.

Thus, to beat a dead horse, can we serve a 480V delta primary : 208Y/120V secondary transformer from a 480Y/277V electrical service?

This topic was brushed on in these two threads, but I was hoping to get an answer for this in a more general sense for the sake of education.

Here is a graphic of the connections, grounding, and bonding that I think are required. Please let me know if you have any feedback or need additional information.
I see that I can't post photos yet. I don't mean any disrespect by my attempt to circumvent the rules by using a link. It's to clarify my request, rather.

Take care,
AsparkyBOI
 
can we serve a 480V delta primary : 208Y/120V secondary transformer from a 480Y/277V electrical service?
Yes it's done everyday and is the standard for most 480 volt systems where you use step-down transformers for the 120 volt loads. I enlarged your sketch for easier reading:

Jto1Zp9.png
 
can we serve a 480V delta primary : 208Y/120V secondary transformer from a 480Y/277V.
Yes
You ignore the fact a neutral exists. Just bring the 3 phase wires to the delta primary.
You may not need a local transformer disconnect if the feeder OCPD is padlockable.
 
Yes it's done everyday and is the standard for most 480 volt systems where you use step-down transformers for the 120 volt loads.
Thanks for this. Shopping around for stepdown transformers on manufacturers' websites suggests this as well (it seems less common to find a WYE on the high side).

Does anyone have any feedback on the grounding/bonding? This gets into separately derived systems and what that means in practical terms. I think we have it figured out, but wanted to double check if possible.

Mike Holt's illustrated guides have also been helpful on our end indeed!
 
Does anyone have any feedback on the grounding/bonding?
The primary 480 side will have an EGC run with the feeder. The NEC requires a terminal for all of the bonding connections within the transformer for the system bonding jumper (SBJ) bonding the case to the X0, the primary EGC, and the supply side bonding jumper (SSBJ). The GEC can connected directly to the X0 or the terminal with a wire type SBJ. The secondary has a SSBJ run with the conductors to the secondary OCPD, it can be certain metal raceways and not a wire type SSBJ. The GEC will be run the building grounding electrode system (GES).
Code tables:
EGC-T250.122
SSBJ, SBJ-T250.102(C)(1)
GEC-T250.66
 
Thanks Rob. I think that cleared it up. Here's an updated schematic.

I updated the transformer graphic to note "grounding terminal" and "x0".

I added the first OCPD on the secondary side and annotated the SSBJ.

Do you see any other immediately apparent concerns?
 

Attachments

  • WYE Service to DELTA Transformer MIKE HOLT 2.0.pdf
    141.8 KB · Views: 10
Good point. I think better wording on my part would have been "electrically continuous"".

I took another gander at Mike Holt's illustration for (NEC 2020) 250.30(A)(1) and updated my drawing.

1750335836362.png

I think we're getting closer to a typical detail for this (480Y service entrance to 480V delta transformer) service application. Would you agree?
 
I think we're getting closer to a typical detail for this (480Y service entrance to 480V delta transformer) service application. Would you agree?
Everything looks correct. One other thing worth mentioning is that a primary disconnect may not be required for the transformer if it complies with 450.14.


450.14 Disconnecting Means.
Transformers, other than Class 2 or Class 3 transformers, shall have a disconnecting means located either in sight of the transformer or in a remote location. Where located in a remote location, the disconnecting means shall be lockable open in accordance with 110.25, and its location shall be field marked on the transformer.
 
1751981299060.png



Questions:
  1. In this diagram, wouldn't all of the neutral current from the 208Y/120V system also return through the EGC, the GEC, and the enclosures to the grounding electrode?
  2. What if the transformer and its disconnect are in a remote location, far from the service meter?
  3. How would you run the GEC?
  4. Wouldn't it be better to install another grounding electrode on the remote transformer, as in the modified diagram?
transf.jpg
 
In this diagram, wouldn't all of the neutral current from the 208Y/120V system also return through the EGC, the GEC, and the enclosures to the grounding electrode?
No. Current does not "return to ground." It returns to the energizing source. So the 208Y/120V neutral current goes back to the X0 terminal on the secondary of the transformer, as that is what is energizing the 208Y/120V system.

Cheers, Wayne
 
In this diagram, wouldn't all of the neutral current from the 208Y/120V system also return through the EGC, the GEC, and the enclosures to the grounding electrode?
No.
The 208Y/120 neutral current is trying to return to its X0 terminal. It does not want to go to the 480V service.
 
View attachment 2578611



Questions:
4. Wouldn't it be better to install another grounding electrode on the remote transformer, as in the modified diagram?
View attachment 2578609
Regarding 4., you have two grounding electrode systems marked in your drawing. Don't all of these electrodes need to be connected together per NEC 2023?

"250.50 Grounding Electrode System.
All grounding electrodes as described in 250.52(A)(1) through (A)(7) that are present at each building or structure served shall be bonded together to form the grounding electrode system. If none of these grounding electrodes exist, one or more of the grounding electrodes specified in 250.52(A)(4) through (A)⁠(8) shall be instal⁠led and used.
Exception:
Concrete-encased electrodes of existing buildings or structures shall not be required to be part of the grounding electrode system if the rebar is not accessible for use without disturbing the concrete."
 
Regarding 4., you have two grounding electrode systems marked in your drawing. Don't all of these electrodes need to be connected together per NEC 2023?

"250.50 Grounding Electrode System.
All grounding electrodes as described in 250.52(A)(1) through (A)(7) that are present at each building or structure served shall be bonded together to form the grounding electrode system.
The transformer is located over 200 feet away from the service, I would not consider this to be in the same building.
 
The transformer is located over 200 feet away from the service, I would not consider this to be in the same building.
Is it in fact in the same building though?

Most of my original inquiry has been addressed, but I'm sure some of the other folks (and myself as able) would be happy to help if you provide some more information.
 
Is it in fact in the same building though?

Most of my original inquiry has been addressed, but I'm sure some of the other folks (and myself as able) would be happy to help if you provide some more information.
Sorry, I got lost in my thoughts. I have a similar situation, almost the same installation, except my service is more than 200 feet from the transformer.
My questions were trying to figure out why the engineer asked me to install another ground rod on the transformer.
Although the neutral current returns to the source, what happens if there's a ground fault?
Would it have to return through the entire system to a ground electrode located so far away?
If another ground rod is added, isn't ground here the same as ground there?
There could be a danger of creating different ground potentials, but if the correct resistance value is guaranteed, wouldn't it be the same?
 
Top