Most of TN is still under the '17 NEC so we are just addressing some of the '23 changes as some areas have adopted that version.
Scenario has arisen:
Question 1:
230.7 prohibits service and non-service conductors to be installed in the same raceway. Under '17n this was pretty cut and dry,'
Under '23, if I leave a meter base and nipple to a 230.85 "Emergency Disconnect, Not Service Equipment" and return to the meter socket thru the same nipple to supply my service panel, is it a violation of 230.7 since the return conductors are ahead of the service disconnect ??
Question 2:
Taking 230.85(B) into account, including the Informational Notes, would it make any difference if the "emergency disconnect" was a service disconnect or one of the others described in 230.85(B) ??
Scenario has arisen:
Question 1:
230.7 prohibits service and non-service conductors to be installed in the same raceway. Under '17n this was pretty cut and dry,'
Under '23, if I leave a meter base and nipple to a 230.85 "Emergency Disconnect, Not Service Equipment" and return to the meter socket thru the same nipple to supply my service panel, is it a violation of 230.7 since the return conductors are ahead of the service disconnect ??
Question 2:
Taking 230.85(B) into account, including the Informational Notes, would it make any difference if the "emergency disconnect" was a service disconnect or one of the others described in 230.85(B) ??