120V circuit supplying 2 pole fused disconnect (jumpered on line side)

Status
Not open for further replies.

MMayo

Member
Location
PA
Occupation
Electrical Engineer
We have an existing condition in a facility where a single phase, 120V outside branch circuit is serving a 30A 2P fused disconnect. The line side of the disconnect has a conductor jumpered between the two line lugs. There are two circuits coming off the load side.

I am proposing this be corrected, but am struggling to find a code section to cite. Is this a violation or just poor practice? Perhaps it was rationalized as a tap initially?
 
The terminals in the disconnect are almost certainly not listed for two conductors so the jumper is a violation. Remove the conductors, splice on two pigtails and you're good to go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jap
It is not a violation unless the terminals are not listed for two conductors as the previous poster mentioned.

It might not make any sense as to why it was done but it is just one of many design choices.
 
The terminals in the disconnect are almost certainly not listed for two conductors so the jumper is a violation. Remove the conductors, splice on two pigtails and you're good to go.
Thank you!
 
The whole 2 conductors under one lug was a code rule that was commonly violated for many years.

Even today I have to remind myself not to violate it as I was one of those offenders back then also.

JAP>
 
The whole 2 conductors under one lug was a code rule that was commonly violated for many years.

Even today I have to remind myself not to violate it as I was one of those offenders back then also.

JAP>
It is only prohibited entirely for grounded conductors, and then only in panel boards iirc Otherwise it depends on the listing.
 
Most generally lugs aren't rated for 2 conductors.

JAP>
Depends on the size. Smaller terminals tend to be listed for two. Some I have seen are listed for as many as five.

Most stuff an average electrician would see are probably only listed for one. Especially in larger sizes.
 
Depends on the size. Smaller terminals tend to be listed for two. Some I have seen are listed for as many as five.

Most stuff an average electrician would see are probably only listed for one. Especially in larger sizes.

To the contrary, the larger lugs are the ones that will accept 2 conductors, not the smaller ones.

But I wouldn't expect the average engineer to see that very often.

JAP>
 
Most stuff an average electrician would see are probably only listed for one. Especially in larger sizes.
I appreciate SQD's clear diagram for double lugs.
1706158332975.png
Though I realized trying it that it really only feels right if the two wires are the same diameter. I had an upsized wire due to reduced voltage drop, and it was not really happy opposite the regular size wire.

Screws that come down on the wire seem bad for double lugs. But when the screw hits a plate, and doubly so for stranded wire, it's a shame when you can only stick one wire in....
 
Though I realized trying it that it really only feels right if the two wires are the same diameter. I had an upsized wire due to reduced voltage drop, and it was not really happy opposite the regular size wire.
What size condcutors are you talking about? The Square D breaker info in your photo would allow two conductors #14-#10. Are you saying that they must be the same size?
 
The larger lugs often have two holes.

The larger lugs have (2) holes if they are double barrel lugs, but, most larger "single" lugs are oval shaped and rated for (2) conductors.

The OP is talking about the line side lugs of a small disconnect where you generally find single barrel lugs only rated for (1) conductor.

For that matter most disconnects up to a 200 amp will generally have single lugs rated for a single conductor where you generally find this type of violation where they have used the lug rated for a single conductor to tap off to another disconnect.

No different than the OP's small disconnect where they jumped off of one lug rated for 1 conductor to feed the other.


JAP>
 
You'd also see this violation a lot in contractor fabricated motor control panels where they would tap a smaller conductor from a larger main OCPD to jumper the line side phases to rows of 30 amp 3p fuse blocks.

Most of those single line side lugs on those fuse blocks weren't rated for more than 1 conductor either but there's a ton of them wired that way.

Those that did know about the violation would generally use PDB's to make the transition from the larger conductor to the line side of the fuse blocks.

Oh well,,,

JAP>
 
I was suprised, but many of the single and two hole chair lugs here in the 1/0-250 range can take two conductors per hole:




As a side note, apparently you can drill and modify the mounting holes, and stack the lugs under one bolt. Oh the horror, the listing violation people are going to have a meltdown!
 
Last edited:
I was suprised, but many of the single and two hole chair lugs here in the 1/0-250 range can take two conductors per hole:




As a side note, apparently you can drill and modify the mounting holes, and stack the lugs under one bolt. Oh the horror, the listing violation people are going to have a meltdown!

Yes, when you buy a single lug, but, the lugs that come in the factory diconnects are generally not your standard after maket chair or stack lugs.

JAP>
 
Just looking at Eatons Disconnect lug capacity specs for instance V2-T1-16.

The 400 amp is the only one with a note 3 beside it that indicates "Note 3" Single barrel lug that accepts one or two cable per phase".

All the rest do not.

JAP>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top