Re: 15or 20 A mp c/b
Jim;
So who should we follow? engineer,NEC ,local AHJ ?
Here's where the circle of compliance applies
Bottom line - NEC is the most basic compliance end - kind of like a "Default" minimums (or maximums) if no other amendments or specifications take priority.
We cannot go below the NEC minimums - unless someone in the Engineering Realm has successfully proven an alternative is safe, and that alternative is accepted by a Governing body (in Bikini would be a change... joke).
Overriding the NEC will be local AHJs, which have adopted it and created amendments to it, and published their own local code (and it's accepted by the Governing Gods). If there are local codes, then these will be the determining factor to minimum compliance.
These two areas cover the Minimum Code Compliance requirements for a given installation. These items may be exceeded (made "Better Than The Minimums), but not "Fallen Below" (less than minimums).
Now comes Contractual Authority(s) Having Jurisdiction!
Project Specifications - either noted directly on Plan Sets, within Project Specification Manuals, or both, are the Minimal Specified Installation requirements for a given project - but may not fall below the minimal compliance of the AHJ (code governing the location of the project) - unless proven to be safe by an EE, under that EE's supervision, and accepted by the AHJ.
Specs typically exceed minimum code requirements, and cover areas which an AHJ has no authority (such as device color).
The "Circle" here is that there's a "Default" minimum compliance, which must at the least be met by THE INSTALLING PERSONNEL. Plancheck looks for design compliance when the EE submits a set to the Building Department for permit issuance. Most design issues are caught in plancheck - but sometimes one slips by without being noted for revision. These are found later in field Inspections, and are the EE's "Boo-Boo". Getting compensation for a FWO on those issues may be simple, or turn into a Nuclear Bombing scenario of "Nasty-Grams" sent to related parties.
If non-compliance is an Installation related issue (using #14 TW al on 150 Amp breakers for example, or packing a 4s box with 35 #12s as another example), then the Installer is liable for this one.
The Circle revolves around as the "Desired Installation" target goals attempt to exist with the "Actual Installation" and the "AHJ's Minimums". Each item revolves around the others, so there's really no better way to say it than the "Circle of Authority".
In a nutshell, install per project specs. If the specs do not comply to minimum applicable codes, the issue(s) must be brought to the Designers' / Client Represenatives' attention, and rectified prior to installation.
If no specs exist for a given project, the minimum compliance will be the local applicable code.
Clear as mud, isn't it?
Scott35