2014 / Romex / Hot Tubs

Status
Not open for further replies.
George Stolz

George Stolz

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Windsor, CO NEC: 2017
Occupation
Hospital Master Electrician
Can I route NM cable though the interior of a 79-unit apartment building to supply the disconnect for a hot tub? Looking at 680.43(C).

EDIT: 680.42(C)
 
Last edited:
ActionDave said:
The section restricts the use of NM to one family dwellings, so I'd say no.
Click to expand...

But does it?

I don't have a copy of the 2014, The definition of Dwelling unit in 2011 says Single unit. So if that is consistent with the 2014 then nope cannot use it.
 
Ok maybe I see the problem. You said 680.42(C) so I assume this is "indoor to outdoor" installation? So if not meeting the requirement there to use "any wiring method in chapter 3.." then you have to default to 680.25?
 
George Stolz said:
Can I route NM cable though the interior of a 79-unit apartment building to supply the disconnect for a hot tub? Looking at 680.43(C).

EDIT: 680.42(C)
Click to expand...

Firstly, What is the construction of the Apartment building?...is it of Type III,IV or V construction?

Second, if it is Type I or II, is the Type NM Cable going to be installed a raceway permitted to be used in Type I and II Construction?

While Section 680.42(C) does modify or amend Chapters 1-4, it specifically says in Section 680.42(C) the following " In the interior of a dwelling unit or in the interior of another building or structure associated with a dwelling unit, any of the wiring methods recognized or permitted in Chapter 3 of this code"

Does the use of Type NM Cable (in the context of your buildings construction) permit it to be installed in the building in the first place...if not then it is not permitted.

So when all of those questions are answered then we can see if Section 680.42(C) can apply...in my opinion.

Note: this is a PRE-COFFEE explanation so......all things considered ;)
 
I can only assume that NM is allowed in the structure as George is certainly aware of that part of the code. Assuming that I don't believe it is an issue to run feeders or branch circuits thru other apts although they cannot terminate in other apts- 210.25

I see there is an art. in 230 (230.3) where the service conductors cannot pass thru another building or structure but I don't see any rule for feeders or BC.
 
Type V. This is a single hot tub (for discussion's sake) served by a house panel. The hot tub can be used by tenants of any of the 79 apartments.

NM is clearly prohibited in the 2011 by 680.42 sending you to Part II; nothing in 680.42 amends 680.21(A)(1) requiring an insulated copper EGC.

2014 muddies the water but it is still prohibited in my application, no?
 
I get it now-- this is not a tub for the individual apt as I thought. It looks like the 2014 has done away with the one family dwelling so I see the problem. It appears to be compliant IMO in 2014 but I am not sure that is the intent
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top