2029 PI: 240.4 — New Exception: Listed Enclosed Panelboard with Integral GFCI Breakers Installed Inline on a Branch Circuit

lavacano

Member
Location
Minnesota
Occupation
Master A Electrician
PUBLIC INPUT

1.) NEC Section/Paragraph: 240.4 — New Exception: Listed Enclosed Panelboard with Integral GFCI Breakers Installed Inline on a Branch Circuit

2.) Public Input Recommends: New text

3.) Public Input:

Proposed new exception to 240.4:

Exception: A listed enclosed panelboard containing only GFCI circuit breakers shall be permitted to be installed inline on a branch circuit where all of the following conditions are met:

(1) The branch circuit overcurrent protective device in the originating panelboard is rated in accordance with the conductor ampacity throughout the entire circuit.

(2) The GFCI circuit breakers in the listed enclosed panelboard are rated equal to or greater than the upstream overcurrent protective device.

(3) The GFCI circuit breakers in the listed enclosed panelboard provide ground fault protection and disconnecting means only and do not serve as the overcurrent protection for the branch circuit conductors.

(4) The outlet or receptacle installed downstream of the listed enclosed panelboard is rated in accordance with the branch circuit rating.


4.) Substantiation:

GFCI protection is required in an increasing number of locations under Article 210. Where a standard branch circuit breaker is installed in the originating panelboard, the options for adding GFCI protection are limited to a GFCI receptacle at the outlet, a GFCI circuit breaker at the originating panelboard, or a GFCI deadface device. In many installations, a GFCI receptacle is not practical or permitted, and replacement of the originating breaker with a GFCI breaker is disproportionately expensive.

Listed enclosed panelboards containing integral GFCI breakers, currently available from multiple manufacturers including Siemens and Eaton, are listed under UL Class CTL as enclosed panelboards — a general listing category not restricted to spa or hot tub applications. These devices are available at significantly lower cost than equivalent GFCI breakers intended for installation in a main panelboard, and provide equivalent ground fault protection.

Where such a device is installed inline on a branch circuit and the upstream overcurrent protective device correctly protects the branch circuit conductors at their full rated ampacity, the GFCI breakers within the listed enclosed panelboard cannot cause a conductor protection problem. The upstream overcurrent protective device will always open before the downstream GFCI breakers operate on overcurrent, as the downstream devices are rated equal to or greater than the upstream device. Conductor protection is therefore maintained throughout the circuit.

This exception would permit the use of a lower-cost listed assembly to provide required GFCI protection on any branch circuit where the upstream overcurrent protective device correctly protects the conductors, without compromising overcurrent protection, ground fault protection, or disconnecting means requirements. Applications include but are not limited to outdoor outlets, garage circuits, countertop appliance circuits, ovens, AC Equip. and other locations where GFCI protection is required and replacement of the originating breaker is impractical or cost-prohibitive.
 
IMHO the device described would already be permitted by existing code. The 'enclosed panelboard' you describe is conceptually a box with several dead front GFCIs in it.

You want GFCI breakers rather than 'devices', but they serve the same role. The box looks like a panel, but instead of a 1 to many bus for feeding breakers, each breaker pole has a separate input terminal.

IMHO if such a box exists, current code allows it to provide GFCI protection. Code simply requires GFCI protection, and lets you use appropriate listed devices to achieve that protection.
 
I suppose using a spa panel as a local disconnect is a much cheaper and easier to find option than most 2-pole GFCI breakers.

Would it currently be a code violation to put in, say, a 2-pole 25A breaker at the main panel for an AC condenser and then use a 50 amp spa GFCI panel as a local disconnect at the AC?
 
Top