Explanation of Negative:
HILBERT, M.: The action should have been to accept this comment in
principle. See my ballot comment on Comment 2-22.
This comment should have been rejected as it does not address the root
cause. Most of the substantiation to provide to GFCI protection for dishwashers
was related to concerns with an appliance. The submitter indicated the vast
majority of failures have been related to either end of life component use,
unexplained electronic circuitry error, or poor quality control as indicated by
chafed wiring. There is no question to the fact that either AFCI or GFCI
protection may have prevented many of these unfortunate events from
happening in the first place, but they should not be used to address an
appliance problem. If the manufacturing process remains unchanged it does
nothing in the terms of safety for the existing dwellings in this country when it
becomes time to replace appliances.