Another EC and I are having a "debate" about the service disconnect(200A) on a SFH.
Here's the "story":
From load side of meter, 2" RGS conduit will enter basement and run appx. 5' to new panel. The total length of service entrance conductors will be appx. 20' (allowing for pipe, fittings, terminations, etc). In the area where the 5' of interior piping is located will be/are:
- water meter and filtering system (appx 2')
- sump pit
- Central vac system (over sump pit) (using another appx.2')
The entire area will framed out/sheetrocked with 1 doorway directly infront of panel area.
The debate centers around:
230.70(1) Readily Accessible Location.
The service disconnecting means shall be installed at a readily accessible location either outside of a building or structure or inside nearest the point of entrance of the service conductors.
One camp (A) says the panel's 200A main CB will be within the scope and intent of 230.70(1)
The other camp(B) disagrees and states the disconnect should be a part of the meter pan to comply with 230.70(1).
I understand various local codes from posters may superceed NEC and that there may some other Articles/resources at play here, too. A few more logs on the fire won't hurt
So whose camp will it be: A or B's?
Here's the "story":
From load side of meter, 2" RGS conduit will enter basement and run appx. 5' to new panel. The total length of service entrance conductors will be appx. 20' (allowing for pipe, fittings, terminations, etc). In the area where the 5' of interior piping is located will be/are:
- water meter and filtering system (appx 2')
- sump pit
- Central vac system (over sump pit) (using another appx.2')
The entire area will framed out/sheetrocked with 1 doorway directly infront of panel area.
The debate centers around:
230.70(1) Readily Accessible Location.
The service disconnecting means shall be installed at a readily accessible location either outside of a building or structure or inside nearest the point of entrance of the service conductors.
One camp (A) says the panel's 200A main CB will be within the scope and intent of 230.70(1)
The other camp(B) disagrees and states the disconnect should be a part of the meter pan to comply with 230.70(1).
I understand various local codes from posters may superceed NEC and that there may some other Articles/resources at play here, too. A few more logs on the fire won't hurt
So whose camp will it be: A or B's?