240.21(C)(6)(1)

Status
Not open for further replies.

david luchini

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Connecticut
Occupation
Engineer
Are we saying that a #6 is still good? Not how I see it

#6 is the minimum allowable conductor size under 240.21(C)(6)(1) for this installation.

#2/0 is the minimum allowable conductor size under 240.21(C)(6)(2) for the 175A secondary c/b.

#2/0 is larger than #6, so #2/0 complies.
 

texie

Senior Member
Location
Fort Collins, Colorado
Occupation
Electrician, Contractor, Inspector
I guess I'm I'm a little confused on the OP. I thought he wanted to know the minimum secondary ampacity he could use. We agreed that would be 58 amps. I didn't think we even knew what his load was. I'm just saying that with the minimum ampacity secondary in his case of 58 amps the minimum conductor size (75 degree C) would be a #6 and a max. OCPD of 60 per 240.21(C)(6)(2). Don't know where this 173 amp load came from.
 

Dennis Alwon

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Chapel Hill, NC
Occupation
Retired Electrical Contractor
#6 is the minimum allowable conductor size under 240.21(C)(6)(1) for this installation.

#2/0 is the minimum allowable conductor size under 240.21(C)(6)(2) for the 175A secondary c/b.

#2/0 is larger than #6, so #2/0 complies.

OKay now we are making sense. You all had me confused because I thought you were saying #6 was compliant.. Thank you for clarifying
 

kwired

Electron manager
Location
NE Nebraska
OK, I get it. Missed the part that said you had 2/0 and a 175 breaker. I thought we were looking for the absolute minimum regardless of load. All good I get it.
That wasn't mentioned until recently.

For no more information then was given in OP, all we could initially answer with was minimum allowed tap conductor has to be at least 58 amps. If actual load supplied is more then that then obviously it needs to increase.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top