3’ high mast

230.28 says "adequate strength" and it is not defined. That pretty much does leave it up to how the inspector feels and 110.2.


A structural engineer could calculate it and write you a report for $500 ;)...

If the guy is reasonable, he would probably accept whatever the utility has written in their guidelines as "adequate strength" unless it is a really unusual install, which this one clearly is not.

The AHJ might have an office policy or "code interpretation" they enforce by. If that policy is written down, you have no leverage at all... but you could keep the policy handy to stay out of trouble.

If it's not written down and the guy is not reasonable about utility specs... he's wrong, but you will not win this battle.
I’d say it’s his burden to prove to say that it’s not compliant
 
In most areas the utility will not hook up a service until after is passes City/County/State inspection. In this case they hooked it up before inspection? Seems odd.

In my area the utility's have specifications on mast size and support. The inspectors generally stay out of it and say to follow the utility rules.

The exception is if they don't feel the mast is tall enough to meet NEC clearances over roofs, pools, etc they call it. The unique thing about that is CA GO95 which is the rules the utility's follow in CA states that local jurisdictions have no say in overhead clearances. Their rules are more lenient on some items such as swimming pools. The inspectors always respond that the can enforce NEC rules on utility owned lines.
Our inspector says not to leave the cover off for his final inspection because sometimes the utility will go ahead and make it hot!
 
Post a photo,
If its secured and strapped within 3' of a piece of kindorf with a strut strap or you 2-hole strap wiht lag screws and end of the raceway is 3 feet from that take him to the state again.
But if its 3' from WH to a roof boot and a hole in plywood I could see him not considering the hole in roof secure enough, I make those holes larger than the pipe then cover it with the boot, not secure at all if did it.
Here we use an Arlington product that’s a rigid cast aluminum roof flange. It has a set screw that tightens against the rigid.

36” above the roof require no additional support.
 
Wow I’ll have to look at that Arlington roof jack that’s a great idea!!!

But going through a holl an 1-8 inch bigger than the mast is considered secure and supported in my book— 100x better than a stupid strap
 
Wow I’ll have to look at that Arlington roof jack that’s a great idea!!!

But going through a holl an 1-8 inch bigger than the mast is considered secure and supported in my book— 100x better than a stupid strap
I agree. Countless times I’ve seen where a 2” RMC mast has been bent from something falling on the service drop.

That messenger wire is strong enough to bend it and yet it’s still securely attached through the roof.
 
Is this what your talking about—-

Ya and if a tree falls and going to bend the mast those areial cables just ripe out service no protection from preventing bent mast— and i have seen push braces puncture roof so that made a problem worse
 
Did I miss it? What size is the overhead drop? I got the 50 feet length and it rises as you head to the pole.

That said 50 feet span is almost nothing and would seldom require additional bracing if only three feet of mast for typical aluminum triplex that would be used here.
 
Is this what your talking about—-

Ya and if a tree falls and going to bend the mast those areial cables just ripe out service no protection from preventing bent mast— and i have seen push braces puncture roof so that made a problem worse
It’s an Arlington 725-1.

A bit pricey. I think I get them for around $34
 
Did I miss it? What size is the overhead drop? I got the 50 feet length and it rises as you head to the pole.

That said 50 feet span is almost nothing and would seldom require additional bracing if only three feet of mast for typical aluminum triplex that would be used here.
All the OP said is its a little less than 3' above the roof, but we don't know if the roof is a RMC conduit support.
A structural engineer could calculate it and write you a report for $500 ;)...

Seems it should not be that hard to calculate, utility people subscribe to software that just spits that out, the OP could ask the utility to do it or
with about 5 inputs one could do a approximate Conduit Mast Deflection and Load Calculation using other inputs from the NESC:
So far we have:
1) Conduit Size: 2" RMC.
2) Span: 50 ft.
What we don't have is
3) Unbraced Length: Distance between the last acutal rigid clamp and where the ASCR is attached (lever arm).
4) Elevation Offset: (Up/downhill, e.g., 15 ft).
5) ACSR Size / type / Name: (e.g., Sparrow).
Using AI I plug in
Conduit Trade Size / Type: (2" RMC).
Span: 50'
Elevation Offset: 15'
ACSR Name: Sparrow.
Solve for Unbraced Length
It says:
===========================================================================
ENGINEERING ANALYSIS: 2" RMC SERVICE MAST STRENGTH
Scenario: 50' Span, #2 ACSR Sparrow, 15' Uphill Elevation Offset
Loading District: NESC Medium
===========================================================================

STEP 1: CONDUCTOR CONSTANTS (#2 ACSR SPARROW)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Bare Weight (w_b): 0.091 lbs/ft
- Diameter (D): 0.316 inches
- Breaking Strength: 2,850 lbs

STEP 2: CALCULATE RESULTANT WEIGHT (w_r) UNDER LOAD
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Formula: w_r = sqrt((w_wire + w_ice)^2 + (w_wind)^2) + K
- Ice (0.25" radial): Adds 0.174 lbs/ft (New Diam: 0.816")
- Wind (4 psf): (0.816/12) * 4 = 0.272 lbs/ft
- NESC Constant (K): 0.200 lbs/ft
- Resultant (w_r): sqrt((0.091+0.174)^2 + 0.272^2) + 0.20
w_r = 0.58 lbs/ft (approx)

STEP 3: CALCULATE TENSION AT MAST (T_max)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because of the 15' uphill slope, the mast at the top carries more
weight than the pole at the bottom.
- Horizontal Tension (H): 500 lbs (Assumed based on 20% RBS)
- Slope Factor: In a 15' rise over 50', the mast supports
nearly the full weight of the wire span.
- Tension at Mast (P): H + (w_r * Elevation_Offset)
500 + (0.58 * 15) = 508.7 lbs (Approx 510 lbs)

STEP 4: DETERMINE CONDUIT STRENGTH LIMIT (M_a)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Material: 2" Rigid Metal Conduit (RMC)
- Section Modulus (S): 0.508 in^3
- Steel Yield (sigma): 30,000 psi
- Strength Factor (SF): 0.85 (NESC Grade C / Residential)
- Allowable Moment (M_a): sigma * S * SF
30,000 * 0.508 * 0.85 = 12,954 in-lbs

STEP 5: SOLVE FOR MAX UNBRACED LENGTH (L)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The "Leverage" formula: M = P * L
Rearranged: L = M_a / P

L = 12,954 in-lbs / 510 lbs
L = 25.40 inches

===========================================================================
FINAL VERDICT:
Max Unbraced Length from top support to wire attachment is 25.4".
Anything higher (like 30") requires a back-guy or 2.5" RMC.
===========================================================================
 
With mast at bottom of hill:
===========================================================================
ENGINEERING ANALYSIS: 2" RMC SERVICE MAST STRENGTH
Scenario: 50' Span, #2 ACSR Sparrow, 15' DOWNHILL Elevation Offset
Loading District: NESC Medium
===========================================================================

STEP 1: CONDUCTOR CONSTANTS (#2 ACSR SPARROW)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Bare Weight (w_b): 0.091 lbs/ft
- Diameter (D): 0.316 inches
- Breaking Strength: 2,850 lbs

STEP 2: CALCULATE RESULTANT WEIGHT (w_r) UNDER LOAD
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Resultant (w_r): 0.58 lbs/ft (Same as uphill scenario)

STEP 3: CALCULATE TENSION AT MAST (T_min)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because the mast is at the bottom, the vertical component of the tension
actually decreases. The "Low Point" of the wire is very close to the
mast, meaning the mast is supporting very little of the wire's weight.
- Horizontal Tension (H): 500 lbs
- Slope Factor: The mast is "downhill," so it supports less
weight. Vertical load is nearly zero or even
slightly negative (uplift) in steep cases.
- Tension at Mast (P): For safety, we use the Horizontal Tension (H)
as the primary force.
P = 500 lbs

STEP 4: DETERMINE CONDUIT STRENGTH LIMIT (M_a)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Material: 2" Rigid Metal Conduit (RMC)
- Allowable Moment (M_a): 12,954 in-lbs (Standard for 2" RMC)

STEP 5: SOLVE FOR MAX UNBRACED LENGTH (L)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The "Leverage" formula: L = M_a / P

L = 12,954 in-lbs / 500 lbs
L = 25.91 inches

===========================================================================
FINAL VERDICT:
Max Unbraced Length from top support to wire attachment is 25.9".
===========================================================================
 
I know some POCOs in my area require a 2 1/2" mast. We usually have to follow the POCO requirements, and they are clearly spelled out and usually exceed the NEC requirements.

Every area is different.
 
Top