Re: 3-Way & 4-Way switch orientation
John,
I am going to start out by apologizing and that is not to sugar coat anything.
I used to start my posts with my current situation & history. I stopped posting all that as it got tedious. I don't know everything and I am here to get up to speed on the 2002 NEC.
HISTORY:
I was very active in the electrical trades from about 1974 to about 1993. Mostly solo.
In 1994 I became a serious student of the 1993 NEC. We had weekly company roundtable discussions about the NEC with dozens of electricians present. The majority of my 1993 NEC assimilation & experience is now dated, dusty, and rusty. I have stated that many times on this forum, and I'm sorry if you missed that.
I was out of the electrical trade from about 1995 to 2003, so I missed a couple of code cycles. I still kept my toe in the construction industry. In the meantime I suffered a workplace injury. I was able to keep working but no more lifting or crawling. I also picked up a substantial amount of computer skills.
SITUATION:
I am in the process of launching a new business venture to support myself. I like hands-on but the rub is the no-lifting restriction. The mix I am working on is combining computer consulting with network & computer cabling; clean computer circuits; data centers; co-location; etc.
For the early part of my career it was just me & the NEC; in 1994 it was me, 100-guys nationwide, and the NEC; now it's me, this forum & the NEC. My point is that this forum has allowed me to participate in a bigger roundtable. A lot of stuff I learned on my own was wrong; a lot of stuff I learned at the 1994 roundtable was wrong; time has passed making a lot of my knowledge moot; but now the mikeholt.com NEC forum allows me to cross-check my knowledge with a huge roundtable. Now it's me, the NEC, and the other 10,000 folks here. That's a better roundtable.
The part I like about the forum concept is I can present an idea or belief. If it's good nobody will object or they may even validate it. If they disagree with me it gives me a chance to re-evaluate my belief or idea. The folks here are pretty quick on the trigger to point out something if it's wrong. But, that's a good thing when it's constructive.
You mentioned that you don't ask too many questions here, or post very often. My teacher once told me the best way to learn is to teach. To paraphrase that: The best way to learn in this forum is to post an answer or a follow-up question. There is a lot to learn and I have learned boatloads here. It has been a fast track for me to attempt to come back up to speed on the 2002 NEC.
I learn something everyday.
I know a lot. I've done a lot. But, I still don't know jack when you get right down to it. That's life.
I am sorry if I have come across to you as superior or thereby made you (or anybody) feel inferior. On the food chain of experts here my 2002 NEC experience is minimal. My knowledge ranking is not in the upper echelon. I feel inferior in that regard to many. But, as long as they don't rub it in my face or flog me I will continue to reach out to them and I try to assimilate all their constructive answers & questions. Due to my current physical condition and due to my lack of recent major electrical experience I am weak and vulnerable here. Hopefully any bullies will not take advantage of my weakness or my inferiority to them. Inferiority is relative, and there will always be someone superior (or inferior) to us in various ways, and depending on the context. Regardless, for now I will continue to post in good faith so I may learn and move forward while I get my legs back.
If this post further aggravates you, please let me know. And, maybe it's time to take this offline for now if any personal issues remain after this post. My intent here is for you to further understand my state-of-mind and my true intentions when posting.
../Wayne C.