kbsparky
Senior Member
- Location
- Delmarva, USA
Many breakers of that size have adjustable trip ratings. Simply adjust it to slightly less than 2000 to equal your 1995 Amp feeder capacity.
Many breakers of that size have adjustable trip ratings. Simply adjust it to slightly less than 2000 to equal your 1995 Amp feeder capacity.
Given the shortness of this run, I would expect that more than 10% of the run is not underground and you would be required to use the ampacity of the above ground portion of the run.Since the 7 sets are underground can you use the ambient temperature correction factor of 1.05 for less than 78??
285 * 7 *1.05 = 2095 amps.
As an inspector I would accept this.
It doesn't work that way. The equipment also has to be listed for use with at 90?C. It is easy to find conductor termintions listed for 90?c, but not so easy to find equipment so listed.Another option is likely 90 degree terminations, which would put you way over the top.
With todays 'electronic trip' breakers 240.6(C) is so easy to meet, it is a wonder it is even still in the code. All it takes is provisions for a wire tie to seal the adjustment access cover in order to provide a feel good sense of security. Past CMP comments indicate it believes that changing breaker settings is similar to replacing fuses which are less than the switch rating (i.e. 300A fuses in a 400A switch).I thought that 240.6(B) said that it would still be considered a 2000 amp rating unless you can meet the requirements of 240.6(C).
You know one that would? For less $$$ then other options?Would it be possible to have an engineer sign off on it?
You know one that would? For less $$$ then other options?
How many AHJ allow an engineered system to be in non-compliance with the NEC? Maybe some localities allow anything with an 'engineering seal of approval' but this is not a generally accepted practice everywhere.Would it be possible to have an engineer sign off on it?
How many AHJ allow an engineered system to be in non-compliance with the NEC? Maybe some localities allow anything with an 'engineering seal of approval' but this is not a generally accepted practice everywhere.
I know of no State licensing authority that would consider it proper practice for an engineer to ignore, if not blatantly go against, a national code.I would think it only happens in rare cases. Even then, the engineer is basically taking on liability by putting his approval on something that otherwise does not meet codes or other standards, so he is not likely to want to do such a thing except in very rare cases, and if that does happen, then watch out for what his seal of approval may end up costing.
I know of no State licensing authority that would consider it proper practice for an engineer to ignore, if not blatantly go against, a national code.
It seems contractors like to think that engineering approval overrides applicable codes but doesn't. Only the AHJ can deem installations to be in compliance.
(C) Engineering Supervision. Under engineering supervision, conductor ampacities shall be permitted to be calculated by means of the following general equation: