358.30 (a)... opinions?

Status
Not open for further replies.

POWER_PIG

Senior Member
Ive always been taught that EMT should be strapped within 3 feet of a coupling. after a friendly disagreement today with a co-worker and actually reading 358.30(a) I see where I may stand correrected. Do ya'll think that a coupling would be defined as a "tubing termination" as described in this particular paragraph?

Thanks for your help,
Pig
 
emt shall be securly fastened in place at least every 3 m (10 ft). if they intended to have a fastener within 3 ft of a coupling wouldnt that make the minimum every 1 m?
 
From '65 to '90, the wording of the NEC required a strap within 3' of a 'fitting'. 'Fitting' was replaced with 'tubing termination' in the '93.
 
POWER_PIG said:
Ive always been taught that EMT should be strapped within 3 feet of a coupling. after a friendly disagreement today with a co-worker and actually reading 358.30(a) I see where I may stand correrected. Do ya'll think that a coupling would be defined as a "tubing termination" as described in this particular paragraph?

Thanks for your help,
Pig

Yes - To your question.

I don't follow you where you say you stand corrected by your co-worker. 358.30(A) says 3' between termination points which a coupler is.

You were/are correct in saying that it is 3' within a coupling.

What length did your co-worker say it was?
 
BackInTheHabit said:
You were/are correct in saying that it is 3' within a coupling.

No, he is not correct in saying that.

348-13.gif


Roger
 
Last edited:
roger said:
No, he is not correct in saying that.

348-13.gif


Roger

I stand corrected once again.:grin:

I interpreted 348.13 incorrectly. I don't have access to all the pretty pictures that most of you have. Would love to have access to them if they are free or readily available.

Haven't done much commercial until recently.
 
BackInTheHabit said:
I stand corrected once again.:grin:

I interpreted 348.13 incorrectly. I don't have access to all the pretty pictures that most of you have. Would love to have access to them if they are free or readily available.

Haven't done much commercial until recently.

Click HERE

Roger
 
480sparky said:
From '65 to '90, the wording of the NEC required a strap within 3' of a 'fitting'. 'Fitting' was replaced with 'tubing termination' in the '93.


This may bring up the "handbook isn't code" arguement but I dug out my '93 handbook and the commentary for 348-12 (348 was the EMT article in '93) says:

"This section has been revised for the 1993 Code so that it no longer requires fastening within 3 feet of every coupling"
 
C3PO said:
This may bring up the "handbook isn't code" arguement but I dug out my '93 handbook and the commentary for 348-12 (348 was the EMT article in '93) says:

"This section has been revised for the 1993 Code so that it no longer requires fastening within 3 feet of every coupling"

Because couplings are fittings, they required support within 3' on each side until the '93.
 
480sparky said:
Because couplings are fittings, they required support within 3' on each side until the '93.

Right, I was trying to add on to your comment. Not contradict it. I should have explained myself more clearly.
 
BackInTheHabit said:
Are you saying you never agreed with me?:-? Or just on this topic?:-?

Well we do seem to disagree with the differences on a panel board and the panel board enclosure and what is and is not allowed in the enclosure.

Yes I do agree with you when you say.

BackInTheHabit said:
Thanks Roger! YUDA man.:grin:
 
jwelectric said:
Well we do seem to disagree with the differences on a panel board and the panel board enclosure and what is and is not allowed in the enclosure.

Yes I do agree with you when you say.

You'll never know! Maybe we'll all come into agreement one of these days.
 
POWER_PIG said:
Ive always been taught that EMT should be strapped within 3 feet of a coupling. Pig

This goes along with the myth that conduit had to be supported within 3' of a 90.Maybe some specs on jobs had called out for it, but it is'nt code.
Rick
 
once again, thanks!

once again, thanks!

Thanks to all who posted!!!
As always, a fantastic source of education.
*Special thanks to Roger, I never new of those cool graphics!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top