sparkchaser1961
Member
- Location
- New York State
Almost.
12.5kW - 12kW = .5kw + 5% = .525 + 8kW = 8,525 watts
8,525 kW / 240V = 35.52 A = 40A circuit.
This is way I read it too.
Almost.
12.5kW - 12kW = .5kw + 5% = .525 + 8kW = 8,525 watts
8,525 kW / 240V = 35.52 A = 40A circuit.
That stinks on the inspectors side. I would think if they don't have a formal written amendment to the code then there is no change from what ever code cycle they are using 02' 05' or 08' If you go by NEC you will not go wrong as it gives you more back up then BillyBob the inspector saying "well thats the way I want it".
Almost.
12.5kW - 12kW = .5kw + 5% = .525 + 8kW = 8,525 watts
8,525 kW / 240V = 35.52 A = 40A circuit.
This is way I read it too.
I will give example:
According to the 2002 code, we are suppose the bury our ground connection. The one that grounds the meter base. Consider: a ground rod must be 8' into the ground and we use 8' ground rods.
Shelby county, TN does not require the ground rod and connection to be below grade, rather they want the ground rod and connection above grade.
Bartlett TN is in Shelby CO but they have their own Insp dept and they follow the current code. Groud rods are to be below grade using the listed "acorn" clamps.
I just wish Shelby CO would go strictly by the NEC book so I have some reference to do my job.
Ahem .... Article 220 is titled "Branch-Circuit, Feeder, and Service Calculations"I don't understand how you can go to an Article that is titled "Feeder, and Service load calculations" and from that extrapolate that a 12.5 KW load need only be feed by an 8.5KW circuit?...PLEASE educate me on this one.....
Ahem .... Article 220 is titled "Branch-Circuit, Feeder, and Service Calculations"
Yes but Table220.55 being referenced is under "Feeders and Service load Calcs" The branch circuit part of that article tells you how many VA to allot for receptacles,outlets,and track light, etc. for the purpose of determining the size of a feeder or service.
I don't like the way it works, ut in addition to Note 4 to 220.55, take a look at 210.19(A)(3) it deals specificially with the branch circuit for household ranges.
Q. I have a 50A receptacle for a range that says the terminations are rated for 75?C conductor sizing. I used 8 AWG Type NM cable, with 90?C conductors, and the inspector failed me. Where did I go wrong?
A. The ampacity for conductors contained in Type NM cable is based on the 60?C rated column of Table 310.16, not the 90?C insulation rating of the conductors [334.80]. According to Table 310.16, 8 AWG is only rated 40A in the 60?C column; therefore, you would be OK if a 40A device protected the circuit. However, the largest range permitted on a 40A circuit would be 16kW, as per Table 220.55. Column C demand load for one 16kW range using Note 1 would be 9.6kW, and this works out to be 40A at 240V.
Come play in my neck of the woods - throw what you think you know in the fire... Acorns are illegal, and for most applications you must pipe no less than EMT to the rods with hubs. (Armored or bare only indoors, and bare may be used in the back of the building only if it has no access to the street. Does it say this anywhere - NO!)I just wish Shelby CO would go strictly by the NEC book so I have some reference to do my job.
IMO its a poorly written code...336-26. Ampacity
The ampacity of Types NM, NMC, and NMS cable shall be that of 60?C (140?F) conductors and shall comply with Section 310-15.
The 90?C (194?F) rating shall be permitted to be used for ampacity derating purposes provided the final derated ampacity does not exceed that for a 60?C (140?F) rated conductor.
the proper note, for a single range,.. is note 1 and the range could be as large as 16,000 watts on a 40 amp circuit ,..unless we can prove this guy, and all those who proof read for him ,. wrong:smile:
http://ecmweb.com/mag/electric_stumped_code_40/
I wasn?t going to comment on this very simple thread that has been brought into question with a lot of debate but I was asked to so here it is and it is so simple.
If Table 220.55 is a clear cut case for sizing branch circuit conductors, why was the Article 422.10 changed in the NEC 2008? rbj
Well,..Mikey ole pal ,...you certainly have a way with words... :roll:
Wise guy,![]()