Well now, ain't this special.
I must side with iwire that engineers can indeed be a pain. My disclaimer for the following is that the devil made me do it (and I'm bored at the moment), so before my electrician side takes over:
That is called quote mining and it is a way in which individuals often try to support a weak position
If you say so, but projection is what I am sensing. Evidently my siding with Bob & Don against you hurt your feelings so much that you felt the need to project
by taking a quote out of context from a person deemed to have authority on a subject by misrepresenting that authority as supporting their own position
If that's the way you have to get it done, fine by me. As for myself, I have enough experience and expertise to feel comfortable with my own positions and feel free to quote others as I see it fits my needs. If you feel uncomfortable freely using other's quotes because you fear someone might not like it, I understand.
Often done by politicians and evolutionists.
I'll take your word for it as that is not my area of expertise.
As for the non-Tom-foolery portion of the conversation: It has long been a practice, and still is a practice to use "LG/LL" nomenclature when referring to 3-phase applications. Even C84.1 used to do that very thing. At one time C84.1 even used both for 3-phase voltages ("LL/LG" for commercial/industrial voltages and "LG/LL" for utility voltages).
Beyond that, C84.1 is only one standard and it is only a voluntary standard at that. While it can be a good reference, it is not followed by everyone. So as I quoted before:
The nice thing about standards is that you have so many to choose from - A.S. Tanenbaum