483 phase.... what?

Status
Not open for further replies.
peter d said:
I'm pretty sure that Paul has told us on another forum that they have to use all brown conductors with phase labeling on each conductor in Europe.
Click to expand...

Yes, labels L1, L2, L3 are the recognized standard in most Continental countries where all brown phases are employed on some of the wiring.

We always used separate phase colors here in the U.K. until they started with all this common European color-coding nonsense.

Color coding and phase identification has become quite complex here in the last few years with the change of systems.
 
383 phase

383 phase

why is thread on this forum. where are the MODERATORS. ?????
 
domnic said:
why is thread on this forum. where are the MODERATORS. ?????
Click to expand...

We're here, what forum do you think it belongs in?

Roger
 
roger said:
We're here, what forum do you think it belongs in?

Roger
Click to expand...
In the "I can't count that high so please remove this from my sight" forum.:grin:

Use binary. You can get up to 1023 that way. 383_d=101111111_b. 483_d=111100011_b. 1023_d=1111111111_b
 
domnic said:
why is thread on this forum. where are the MODERATORS. ?????
Click to expand...

Honestly Dominic I don't pay a bit of attention to what forum I am looking at, it's all the Mike Holt Forum.

However if someone sends me a PM or uses the report a post feature I am glad to help them out.

When someone decides to post "where are the MODERATORS. ?????" in the middle of a thread I am not so helpful.
 
to MeMyselfandI,
Today is the 7th, 6:59AM.
How does your forum post rate a date of 8th at 7:54AM?
" 06-08-2008, 07:54 AM "

Mike must have a new, faster server running!
 
glene77is said:
to MeMyselfandI,
Today is the 7th, 6:59AM.
How does your forum post rate a date of 8th at 7:54AM?
" 06-08-2008, 07:54 AM "

Mike must have a new, faster server running!
Click to expand...
Maybe this will help explain it :grin: :
Biography:
20 Years at Univ. of TN
 
weressl said:
Yeah, if somebody could explain it to me what is the logic in the US date coding?

Why not start with the smallest unit then the next largest and so on, like day/month/year?
Click to expand...

Who's to say 7/7/08 is not just that. :wink:

Roger
 
weressl said:
what is the logic in the US date coding?
Click to expand...

Who said there was any logic to it. :grin:

Here is my wild guess. The format M/D/Y matches what we would write or say.

I would say my birthday is July 21 1964, I would not say 21 July 1964. It just sounds wrong to a guy growing up here. :smile:
 
iwire said:
Who said there was any logic to it. :grin:

Here is my wild guess. The format M/D/Y matches what we would write or say.

I would say my birthday is July 21 1964, I would not say 21 July 1964. It just sounds wrong to a guy growing up here. :smile:
Click to expand...
But Laszlo ain't from 'round here.:smile:
 
Its arbitrary, so the logic is minimal but there.

The date code matches the way the dates are said:

April 14, 1865 becomes 4/14/1865

Frankly, I prefer date coding where you start with the largest unit first and work down to the smallest, thus:
1865-4-14

This has the nice feature of letting you extend down to smaller units
1865-4-14T22:15

-Jon
 
winnie said:
Its arbitrary, so the logic is minimal but there.

The date code matches the way the dates are said:

April 14, 1865 becomes 4/14/1865

Frankly, I prefer date coding where you start with the largest unit first and work down to the smallest, thus:
1865-4-14

This has the nice feature of letting you extend down to smaller units
1865-4-14T22:15

-Jon
Click to expand...
I still like the leading zero. We have some stupid software that doesn't know 4 comes before 10.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top