rustyryan34
Member
76nemo said:Read .122, and get back to me.
Do you mean 250.122. I would like to use 250.122 to bond water pipes that enter the house in plastic, but according to 250.104(a)(1) i have to use 260.66 anyways.
76nemo said:Read .122, and get back to me.
rustyryan34 said:Do you mean 250.122. I would like to use 250.122 to bond water pipes that enter the house in plastic, but according to 250.104(a)(1) i have to use 260.66 anyways.
76nemo said:I am guilty of PWI, please forgive me. "Enter the house in plastic"? Let's step back a minute. If you have to use #4, than it's a local amendment.
76nemo said:Did I read that correctly that the water service enters in PVC?
76nemo said:Forget the water main, run two rods and forget the hassle
rustyryan34 said:Hey it wisconsin we have to run 2 rods. thank you.
76nemo said:Why are you worried about bonding the water main then?
winnie said:_All_ grounding electrodes must be used. This means that if you happen to have an underground water pipe that qualifies as a grounding electrode, you _must_ use it.
When you size a GEC to an underground water pipe, you need to use one table.
When you size an EGC, you need to use a different table, with the exception of water piping systems. For metallic water pipes, you must use the GEC sizing rules, even if the water pipes do not include grounding electrodes.
-Jon
George Stolz said:Then you're one of the few - I still don't understand why we use table 250.66 instead of 250.122.
Seems like this changed somewhat in the 2008, but I don't recall exactly what the change was off the top of my head.
Not necessarily - depending on your AHJ's read of 250.64B it could mean a few bucks more in material for #4 or a few bucks more in labor and materials for #6 to put it in conduit or armored cable. One you could staple bare in most places the other would be subject to whatever the AHJ's mood on "physical damage" or "severe" is. It is a trade off that many companies make into policy, or depending on the situation.rustyryan34 said:You have to use #4 from the chart on 250.66 but if you use 250.66(a) yes we cango down to #6. Our company just waste the money for #4.
That wording was added in '02 I think??? Note it doesn't say sub-panel in there anywhere.... So the following makes little sense to include unless the circuit came from a main panel, and a little contradictory.shall be bonded to the service equipment enclosure, the grounded conductor at the service, the grounding electrode conductor where of sufficient size, or to the one or more grounding electrodes used.
The equipment grounding conductor for the circuit that may energize the piping shall be permitted to serve as the bonding means.