50 Most Common NEC Violations

Status
Not open for further replies.
We are on the 2005 code in CT. I will keep this in mind next time I do a 100 amp sub-panel though. Also i am going to ask some inspector friends of mine what they think. That was an interesting list. Here's one I found out about not long ago that is probably violated a lot. Electric baseboard heat is supposed to be calculated as a continuous load, so 2-8footers, (4000watts) at 240 is 16.67 amps, X 1.25 % is 20.84 amps, now you need # 10's and 30 amp breaker. I found that out when a friend (not an electrician), wanted to install a 4000 watt unit heater. He said what size wire should he run and I said # 12. Then we talked again and he said ("How come the booklet says #10?) Maybe I am missing something though because it would be a pain running #10's for a couple of heaters.
 
Why is this your favorite?
The old code allowed dryers and ovens to be wired with 3 wires. That's why(even now) they STILL sell 3 wires 30A dryer receptacles, 3 wires dryer cords, 3 wires 50A receptacles and 3 wires oven cords. I seriously doubt anyone's attempting new installations with that configurations, and definitely not that often to be a favorite.

10/2 wg was not allowed for dryers had to be 10/3 or se cable?
 
Around here many twist their bare grounds together, no wire nut stacon wago greenie, pass inspection.

Many coach lites and floodlites attached to wood siding with no box, should be easy for inspector to catch but usually still pass inspection.
 
Around here many twist their bare grounds together, no wire nut stacon wago greenie, pass inspection.

Many coach lites and floodlites attached to wood siding with no box, should be easy for inspector to catch but usually still pass inspection.

Twisted grounds with no connector are usually things from quite some time ago when I do run into them.

I do run into a lot of luminaires - indoors and out that have no outlet box.

other items maybe not mentioned yet-

multiple conductors in a lug or other termination device only designed for one.

bootleging an equipment ground from the neutral conductor at a receptacle outlet where no equipment ground exists

I run into a fair amount of 15 or 20 amp 120 volt branch circuits for lighting or receptacle outlets that have had 30 amp overcurrent device installed - it used to be and still is common in places with fuse panels, but have been running into circuit breaker panels where someone installed a 30 amp breaker.

240 volt cord and plug connected equipment is always connected to a 50 amp circuit - some reason people think "220" is only available in 50 amps - they have a welder outlet and everything else they buy that is "220" has an attachment plug put on it so it will plug into that 50 amp outlet, even if it came with a cord already on it they either remove the end or make an adapter cordset.

use of ground rod in place of an equipment grounding conductor - probably the most dangerous of anything mentioned so far.
 
In iWire's vein, from the past, # of current carrying conductors in a raceway. Circa 1995 and back. Still see this when someone pulls a feeder, and then installs a couple of #12's in the same conduit. Technically that is more than 3 current carrying conductors which requires derating of the feeder. I have even seen an Engineer spec this.

outlet box not flush or protruding from cumbustible wall material.

loose connectors and couplings. Especially compression. Can't say how many times I have seen people tighten them by hand or half butted!

#12 ground pigtail on #10 ground wire
 
Didn’t read everything, so I may be repeating. But I’ve seen:
-Overloaded circuits
-Extension cords used in-place of NM cable
-NM cable buried underground
-Uf cable spliced underground with wire-nuts
-Equipment grounds used as grounded conductors
-Low voltage rings used to house high voltage electrical devices
-Extension cords buried underground
-Porkies used in closet spaces
-etc etc
 
Didn?t read everything, so I may be repeating. But I?ve seen:
-Overloaded circuits
-Extension cords used in-place of NM cable
-NM cable buried underground
-Uf cable spliced underground with wire-nuts-Equipment grounds used as grounded conductors
-Low voltage rings used to house high voltage electrical devices
-Extension cords buried underground
-Porkies used in closet spaces
-etc etc

And why is this a violation? they do make UL listed DB rated wire nuts, Ideal calls theirs "Twisters" use them all the time for repairing postlight feeds.

what are Porkies?
 
one of the one I find around here is people using Table 310.15(B)(6) on commercial installs, mainly 400 amp services with 500kcmil instead of 600kcmil, or 2/0 instead or 3.0 on a 200 amp service or feeder, mainly done by a residential electrician.

on a upgrade where they installed the new service panel at a new location using the old panel as a sub but not upgrading a 3-wire range or dryer feed to a 4 wire or relocating it to the new service panel.

NM in wet locations

boot legging grounds from the neutral (as mention very dangerous)

3-wire sub panel feeders

no electrodes at garages where fed by feeders

not grounding switch's when required

not sealing service conduit or others coming in from the outside where you have a difference of temp

forgetting to tighten setscrews on conduit fittings

more then one wire in a lug not listed for it

wall space violations, common is not including a fixed panel on French doors or sliders or railing partitions around stairs.

running URD or other non 310.13 listed conductors in a NEC covered install

set back box's mainly in cabinets without being flush

receptacle for dishwasher installed behind it.

NM sheathing cut short and not 1/4" inside of the box

dimmers on switch receptacles

no egc in FMC or LTMFC where circuit amperage exceeds the rating allowed for it, or 3/8"

fan rated box's where the fan is supported by it (not a violation if the fan bracket is supported to the joist and not the box)

using SABC to supply fixed in place appliances that are not allowed in 210 like dishwashers, disposals, ice makers, compactors.

splitting a 320 meter to two 200 amp main breaker panels not grouped 230.72

using overhead riser pipe to support TV antennas, cable drops, telephone drops.

no disconnect on water heaters

putting other loads on furnace circuits

underground UF cable barely 6" in the ground, many times just under the sod

using UF cable to feed pool equipment

mobile homes with bare copper EGC feeders.

not using expansion joints in PVC where it exits grade or on long runs

not derating conductors on roof tops

using vegetation such as trees to support overhead conductors

using ATS on generators not rated for load served

running LV conductors in line voltage conduits

running LV conductors in service panel (door bell transformer also installed in panel)

emergency lights and exits fed from dedicated circuit instead of put on with the lighting in area served.

receptacles above dropped ceilings with cords plugged in

NM used in places of assembly or with a stage

not maintaining 1 1/4" from stud edge without nail plates (hard to do where the wire enters a box)

wall space requirements for other walls in a kitchen 210.52

still trying to use dedicated receptacle in lew of GFCI as required now in the 2008
 
I'm sorry is this a violation? What article number is it a violation of?

It may or may not be - more details of the installation will make a difference. If you had multiple circuits in a raceway and 10AWG EGC was required for largest overcurrent device protecting conductors in that raceway then you need to run 10 AWG in the raceway. But a 12 AWG EGC pigtail to a device on a 20 amp circuit supplied by 12 AWG conductors is certainly acceptable.
 
one of the one I find around here is people using Table 310.15(B)(6) on commercial installs, mainly 400 amp services with 500kcmil instead of 600kcmil, or 2/0 instead or 3.0 on a 200 amp service or feeder, mainly done by a residential electrician.

If the calculated load on the conductors is less than 381 amps why is this a violation with the 400 amp situation?
 
Lets remember the OP was asking about most common violations - not just anything you recall seeing.

It may or may not be - more details of the installation will make a difference. If you had multiple circuits in a raceway and 10AWG EGC was required for largest overcurrent device protecting conductors in that raceway then you need to run 10 AWG in the raceway. But a 12 AWG EGC pigtail to a device on a 20 amp circuit supplied by 12 AWG conductors is certainly acceptable.

If the calculated load on the conductors is less than 381 amps why is this a violation with the 400 amp situation?

Do you wake up in the morning excited to come here and nit pick the heck out of every post? :?
 
Do you wake up in the morning excited to come here and nit pick the heck out of every post? :?

The first quote - maybe is nit picking

The others - I would hope people want to be corrected if they are wrong. If I was inaccurate with what I said in those posts by all means correct me - that is part of why I come here - if no one corrects it I have to assume everyone agrees with what I said.

You have a way of nit picking the hell out of things at times. Especially when responding to certain members. You only nit pick at somewhere between 35 and 65% of my material. There are other members where it is much closer to 100% especially your friend T.M.:happyyes:
 
It may or may not be - more details of the installation will make a difference. If you had multiple circuits in a raceway and 10AWG EGC was required for largest overcurrent device protecting conductors in that raceway then you need to run 10 AWG in the raceway. But a 12 AWG EGC pigtail to a device on a 20 amp circuit supplied by 12 AWG conductors is certainly acceptable.

Scenario: 3 #6 thhn copper conductors feeding a range receptacle in a kitchen (commercial) 1 #10 egc all run in 1" emt to a 4 11/16" box with 2 gang mud ring.
I agree tail to receptacle needs #10 but what about tail to box? Is it a violation to use a grounding tail with #12 (purchased)?
 
Do you wake up in the morning excited to come here and nit pick the heck out of every post? :?

The first quote - maybe is nit picking

The others - I would hope people want to be corrected if they are wrong. If I was inaccurate with what I said in those posts by all means correct me - that is part of why I come here - if no one corrects it I have to assume everyone agrees with what I said.

You have a way of nit picking the hell out of things at times. Especially when responding to certain members. You only nit pick at somewhere between 35 and 65% of my material. There are other members where it is much closer to 100% especially your friend T.M.:happyyes:

LMAO,,,,now now children.
 
Scenario: 3 #6 thhn copper conductors feeding a range receptacle in a kitchen (commercial) 1 #10 egc all run in 1" emt to a 4 11/16" box with 2 gang mud ring.
I agree tail to receptacle needs #10 but what about tail to box? Is it a violation to use a grounding tail with #12 (purchased)?

Why would the tail to the box not need to be minimum required by 250.122? - if ungrounded conductors are increased in size for any reason then the EGC must also be increased proportionally is the only reason for it to be something other than what 250.122 calls for.
 
I am asking all you inspectors, contractors, engineeers or anyone else with an opinion what are the 50 Most Common NEC Violations?

Really depends on the type of work. Old work residential, Old work commercial or new construction.

The most common I notice is the most simple...... Missing box covers.

Then residential is the old open splice ( no box at all).


It hard to state the most common without a specific type of work. With old houses it's just easier to say open the code book and pick one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top