- Location
- Massachusetts
I can see how you both see it... but it doesn't say that.
It may not say it to you but it aprently says it to others.
I can see how you both see it... but it doesn't say that.
Rather obvious, I'd say...It may not say it to you but it aprently says it to others.
Rather obvious, I'd say...
While we can and should debate where the GFP protection should be located in the circuit, the situation that the OP has is another matter. My point to him is that there should not be GFCI protection on the shore power outlets. Only GF is required for these and putting GFCI on a shore power outlet is not required or a good practice. In fact if you read the ROP on this for 2011, GFCI protection for shore power was 1 change submitted by Eaton but rejected as being to unreliable to this application. The 100 mA GF protection was approved instead.
The OP seems to indicate that Eaton has told him that the 30 amp outlets of the pedestals are protected with 5 mA GFCI and that is they way they must be. I disagree, that is not a code requirement or a good idea.