A well of a question

Status
Not open for further replies.

wyatt

Senior Member
2 houses one well. They would like to power the well from both houses. They do not want a well house service. A transfer switch at the pump would allow them to select house 1,off,or house 2. My question is there any problems ( NEC or design ) with the EGC's bonded together or should they be isolated.
 
Re: A well of a question

using your method they have to be bonded, otherwise one EG wouldn't be used at all providing no fault protection for that specific circuit, may I recommend a cheaper, safer method. install two receptacles side bv side labeling them, one from each home, attach a cord to the pump pressure switch. this way anyone servicing it could never make a mistake.
 
Re: A well of a question

I just wonder who in the family gets to run out in the cold to flip the switch before he/she can take a shower ?? :D :roll:
 
Re: A well of a question

I really don't care who goes out in the snow to flip a switch. so long as they come out to put a big fat check in the mail to me. Well service would be best but not my choice. The receptacle ideal is not bad thanks,
 
Re: A well of a question

Use a remote controlled ATS...put a DT toggle in each house...but seriously, how will that work, I assume the water is always going to each house? There will be no reason to flip it.

That sounds like a weird setup, but hey, the customer is always right!
 
Re: A well of a question

I have it! Run a wire from phase A in one house, and a wire from phase B in the other. Now they'll share the expense.
 
Re: A well of a question

Quoted by Larry:
I have it! Run a wire from phase A in one house, and a wire from phase B in the other. Now they'll share the expense.
that is nice idea but sound like some kind crazy 3 way set up to me

but really in moot point is if you set up a "reversed" transfer switch with alternating relay to run the power source evenly much as it can.

i dont know how it can work out on this one i haven't see this set up for long time


Merci, Marc
 
Re: A well of a question

How about a automatic alternator? That way each time pump starts it could operate off different feed, Normally it would be used to operate 2 different pumps or whatever.The downside would be, it could cost more then adding a 3rd meter.
 
Re: A well of a question

The two H.O.'s are family. the both are biulding cabins up in the mountains. I think the deal is that when one family is up they will put the swithch in the house position. to me looks like a fight wating to happen. But they want the cheapest way to get this to work.
 
Re: A well of a question

How much water do they figure they'll use? If they think the electrical expense of running the well pump will be such an issue that they need to divide the bill, wouldn't it be better to just install meters to record the amount of water used per each and the total power consumption of the well pump?

One meter on the electricity supplied by one home to record the power consumption and one water meter in each home to record the gallons consumption. Then divide the electrical cost baseed on usage.

This could also provide a means to record usage over the long haul and be used to divide the maintenance costs of the well if this is such an issue.

The alternative is to open the wallet and drill a second well. Then, problem solved.

Bob
 
Re: A well of a question

Does this installation violate NEC 210.25 Common Area Branch Circuits ? Maybe not because the well pump is being suppled by both homes. Just wondering.

romeo
 
Re: A well of a question

A separate pump for each house would make the most sense. Do well pumps cost that much? It would have to be cheaper than any kind of transfer switch.

Steve
 
Re: A well of a question

I think we are all looking at this bas-ackwards. It sounds to me like the plumbing is set up to allow the single pump to supply water to both houses at the same time. The only question is who pays for the electricity to run the pump. I mean if I had one of the two units, and if I were there and the other family were not there, I might be tempted to switch the pump to their side, so they can pay for supplying my water. :D

Seriously, though, a simple solution is all that is needed here. I agree with Steve. I like the idea of separate pumps, separate plumbing, and separate branch circuits.
 
Re: A well of a question

I think one person needs to pay for the power and then put water meters on each line. Figure out how much kw per GPM and do the math.

Having both houses connected to the pump through a xfr/sw caould be made legal with proper disconnecting means required in or around 225.31. You would be treating the well as a seperate structure.
 
Re: A well of a question

Is there enough room in one existing well casing to accommodate this solution?

Bob
 
Re: A well of a question

How about a metered service to the well, and they divide the bill 50/50 problem solved.
 
Re: A well of a question

Sandsnow got in ahead of me. The solution I was asking about was stated by Charlie b. That is, using two separate pumps. I'm assuming this is a well with a submersible pump.

I do believe the same as Charlie that these two households want to share a well but not split the cost 50/50 rather, they wish to pay their individual share of the operating cost. As far as maintenance and installation, I don't know what they want but realizing their concern about the small cost of running the well pump, my guess is they would be equally concerned about these other costs and want to equitably share them as well. This would mean that the percent use of the pump would translate into a percent responsibility for maintaining and installing.

Bob
 
Re: A well of a question

why not do this? 1 person pays 75% of the $1000 dollar insulation cost and the other pay the power or something like that it will save them both money in the long run. It would save them both a substantial up front cost and make your life easier.


Disclaimer: I'm just an engineer this may make too much sense for normal people to understand.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top