winnie
Senior Member
- Location
- Springfield, MA, USA
- Occupation
- Electric motor research
I noticed an interesting 'change of perspective' shown in the 'AFCI Absolution' thread http://forums.mikeholt.com/showthread.php?t=98436
The basis of most of the discussion in the thread was that AFCIs are detecting _real_ wiring flaws. The flaws might be difficult or expensive to find, and it may be difficult to explain to the customer why these flaws are showing up now, but that the flaws are real. The only comment alluding to actual _false_ tripping was brant's mention of 'your vacuum may not work'...
On another AFCI thread, one poster commented that _all_ AFCI problems that he had seen were installation flaws, _not_ problems with the AFCIs themselves. http://forums.mikeholt.com/showthread.php?p=823690#post823690
But in the past several years, the idea of actual _false_ tripping has been brought up as one of the major arguments against AFCIs.
With the above in mind, I'd like to suggest this thread as a place to record your actual experiences with AFCI tripping, the steps that you took to locate the cause of the tripping, and what you did to resolve the issue. In particular, the goal is to identify if the AFCI was tripping because of a subtle but _real_ wiring flaw ( say a nail through romex, that wasn't causing a short, a neutral to ground contact, a loose screw, etc.) or if the AFCI was tripping because of _normal_ operation of a load on a _proper_ circuit.
I'd request that discussions of the merits, costs, or politics of AFCIs please be kept out of this thread, so that this thread becomes a source of real (if non-rigorous) field data regarding AFCI installations and problems.
-Jon
The basis of most of the discussion in the thread was that AFCIs are detecting _real_ wiring flaws. The flaws might be difficult or expensive to find, and it may be difficult to explain to the customer why these flaws are showing up now, but that the flaws are real. The only comment alluding to actual _false_ tripping was brant's mention of 'your vacuum may not work'...
On another AFCI thread, one poster commented that _all_ AFCI problems that he had seen were installation flaws, _not_ problems with the AFCIs themselves. http://forums.mikeholt.com/showthread.php?p=823690#post823690
But in the past several years, the idea of actual _false_ tripping has been brought up as one of the major arguments against AFCIs.
With the above in mind, I'd like to suggest this thread as a place to record your actual experiences with AFCI tripping, the steps that you took to locate the cause of the tripping, and what you did to resolve the issue. In particular, the goal is to identify if the AFCI was tripping because of a subtle but _real_ wiring flaw ( say a nail through romex, that wasn't causing a short, a neutral to ground contact, a loose screw, etc.) or if the AFCI was tripping because of _normal_ operation of a load on a _proper_ circuit.
I'd request that discussions of the merits, costs, or politics of AFCIs please be kept out of this thread, so that this thread becomes a source of real (if non-rigorous) field data regarding AFCI installations and problems.
-Jon