Regarding protection offered by AFCI's I was confused by a statements found on your website and in your book, "Understanding The National Electrical Code" -2002.
Website Q/A: What type of arcs are the most common factors in electrical fires, and will today?s AFCI circuit breakers detect these faults?
An AFCI is designed to detect and clear a line-to-neutral fault under conditions where a standard circuit breaker might not (3 to 8 cycles as compared to 600 half-cycles, depending on the available fault at the failure). Loose electrical terminations and connections should generate enough heat to create a line-to-neutral fault or a line-to-ground fault, which will be detected by the AFCI or GFI circuitry.
2002 Textbook, P.61: "WARNING: AFCI protection devices are not designed to prevent fires caused by series arcing at loose connections to a receptacle, switch, device or in a splice".
Are these two statements contradictory?
Thanks,
vsparks
Website Q/A: What type of arcs are the most common factors in electrical fires, and will today?s AFCI circuit breakers detect these faults?
An AFCI is designed to detect and clear a line-to-neutral fault under conditions where a standard circuit breaker might not (3 to 8 cycles as compared to 600 half-cycles, depending on the available fault at the failure). Loose electrical terminations and connections should generate enough heat to create a line-to-neutral fault or a line-to-ground fault, which will be detected by the AFCI or GFI circuitry.
2002 Textbook, P.61: "WARNING: AFCI protection devices are not designed to prevent fires caused by series arcing at loose connections to a receptacle, switch, device or in a splice".
Are these two statements contradictory?
Thanks,
vsparks