Eye arnt a lectricshun, but have worked with many while commissioning my electro-hydraulic installations. All large companies seem to connect maintenance welders (as opposed to production machines) with plug-in disconnects which have to be off to plug or unplug the cord. Is this not almost universal?
A single welder is what this post is about.
JAP>
But let's go ahead and confuse the issue.
I am installing a 6-50 receptacle for a welding machine. The welder comes with the 6-50 plug on the cord. I see in 630.13 a disconnecting means is required in the supply circuit if it is not equipped with a disconnect mounted as an integral part of the welder. The welder has an on/off switch, I don't know if this counts as a discconect, it doesn't sound like it. The supply circuit does have a branch circuit breaker in the breaker panel, can this count as the disconnect? It sounds like it to me but from other threads I read it sounds like others are installing a switch right next to the receptacle or using an integral disconnect/receptacle. I don't see the words "within sight" or "immediately adjacent to" or anything similar. What's the deal?
Thanks
It seems to be what this forum is best at.
I don't actually know how we got to this point from Post #1.
JAP>
Jumper started it. If he'd kept quiet the cord would have been the disconnect.
I looked up a small welder and if it was typical of these small units then the OP is good. The switch broke both legs. This with a cord connection should satisfy the NEC for a disconnecting means for a single small welder.