allenwayne
Senior Member
Re: Arc faults- Bedrooms and Smoke Detectors
You have all to much time on your hands
You have all to much time on your hands
They could be required if the have provisions for cooking as they will fit the provision in the definition of article 100Motels and dormitories are not required to have AFCI.
Dwelling Unit. One or more rooms for the use of one or more persons as a housekeeping unit with space for eating, living, and sleeping, and permanent provisions for cooking and sanitation.
Why?2. Power failure alarm. If the power fails in the middle of the night you do need to wake up.
An AFCI is not going to prevent an arc but it is intended to prevent the electrical arc from igniting the building. (Assuming they workOriginally posted by mc5w:
An AFCI does not prevent an electrical fire, it just keeps the fire from getting bigger.
10 amp or 100 amp breaker provide approximately the same short circuit current. (instantaneous trip)Originally posted by mc5w:
2. For certain small loads a 10 amp circuit breaker provides added protection.
mc your scrambling to find a way that a 10 amp breaker would be accapatable to protect K & T circuits in a house.Originally posted by mc5w:
Do you want to get docked by your boss if you are late for work?
That article 210 does not recognize 10 amp branch circuits does not square with industrial practice with small motors. If all of the recptacles are disconnected from the knob and tube wiring then a 10 amp circuit breaker of fuse is often adequate.
Bob, that's a stretch, isn't it? 210.21(B)(3) lays down the receptacle rating requirements for branch circuits. It's not specifying ratings of branch circuits, it specifying the receptacle rating requirements. Since there's no 10-amp circuit rating, it's a mystery on what rating receptacle to put on that circuit. But mysteries aren't illegal.Originally posted by iwire:
So the CPSC is recommending a violation of 210.21(B)(3)?![]()
Originally posted by georgestolz:
Originally posted by iwire:
So the CPSC is recommending a violation of 210.21(B)(3)?![]()
It does not say "shall not be more (or less) than the table values"
Why do people keep coming up with these stupid ideas trying to get out of something that the National Fire Protection Association has worked so hard to implement? Is it that we think that we are smarter than they are? Is it that we think they don?t know what they are doing?Originally posted by mc5w:
Now for a crazy idea. SquareD make 10 amp circuit breakers for their QO and NQOD panels. Some applications are:
Now, why not supply the smoke and carbon monoxide alarms from a QO110 circuit breaker? This would theoretically exempt the bedroom smoke alarms from AFCI protection. Since only 12 smoke alarms and 6 other devices can be hard-wired together the total load is less than 1.5 amps in the case of First Alert brand.
This is just as much a technical exemption as a 240 volt heater or air conditioner in a bedroom.
I don't really see where the NFPA had much to do with the AFCI rule. The code is written by the people who send in the proposals and comments. The big guns behind the AFCI rule were the people who have an economic interest in them.Why do people keep coming up with these stupid ideas trying to get out of something that the National Fire Protection Association has worked so hard to implement?