fuse vs non-fuse
fuse vs non-fuse
Kinda a "tiger by the tail" issue for you, Amanda. As others have stated, unless you know all the specs about the load served, it can change from "danged contractor/electrician" to "danged designer/engineer".
If you unit requires protection by fuse only and you spec non-fuse...bad call.....if the load doesn't specify and you go fusible....somewhat bad call ($$ wise).
From my experience, the equipment installed does not alays match what was spec'ed so fusible is probaly a safe call. If the unit requires fuses, you are ready and if the unit requires a lower overcurrent protection than the breaker provides, you have that covered too.
I see a lot of plans that call for 30 amp or 60 amp circuits to RTUs and, once they are in place, the max OCP turns out to be less. It a matter of perference, but many electricians I meet rather just install the proper fuse rather than have to change out the breaker. (The units often require "odd" size overcurrent protection which is more readily available off the shelf as a fuse than as a breaker)