mtnelect
HVAC & Electrical Contractor
- Location
- Southern California
- Occupation
- Contractor, C10 & C20 - Semi Retired
Using the 75 degree column vs 60 is not "derating"
Doesn't that result in a smaller wire size ?
Using the 75 degree column vs 60 is not "derating"
Ok but what does that change? If u calculate the ampacity required for a package unit, it's the same as a "regular" motor load.
AC equipment wire size is based on the equipment nameplate MCA Period. And the breaker size is based on the MOCP on the unit's nameplate as well. No calculations needed as the MCA already includes the required 125% included.
Then I rate the required wire size based on the temperature requirements of the lowest temp rated equipment in the circuit Breaker, disconnect and equipment and derate for temp rating and #of conductors etc.
It could well be that all AC equipment is rated for 75C as @don_resqcapt19 mentioned. No one is installing 60 C wire any longer although some may exist in a replacement.
Usually under 100 amps the assumption is 60C and 100 and up 75C
I see nothing stating a wire size. It appears to me that the footnote is related to a table that actually specifies a conductor size.
EDIT: I found the rest of the page.
There is a table of wire sizes at the bottom of the page you showed us. The note applies to that table, but there in no language limiting you to the use of conductors at the 60°C ampacity.
Wire Size based on N.E.C. for 60° type copper conductors.
COPPER WIRE SIZE — AWG
(1% Voltage Drop) Supply Wire Length-Feet Supply Circuit Ampacity200 150 100 506 8 10 1415 4 6 8 1220 4 6 8 1025 4 4 6 1030 3 4 6 835 3 4 6 840 2 3 4 645 2 3 4 650
And who is saying anything to the contrary?Section 440.35 states:
The ampacity of the conductors supplying multirotor and combination-load equipment shall not be less than the minimum circuit ampacity marked on the equipment in accordance with 440.4(B).
And who is saying anything to the contrary?
They do?All the HVAC manufacturers state in their engineering data that the minimum circuit capacity is based on 60-degree wire sizes.
And who is saying anything to the contrary?
I would just like you to answer my question
And nothing requires the use of 60°C conductor ampacities for the minimum circuit ampacity. Use of a 75°C conductor with a 75°C ampacity equal to or greater then the minimum circuit ampacity shown on the nameplate is compliant with all of the requirements of the NEC.Section 440.35 states:
The ampacity of the conductors supplying multirotor and combination-load equipment shall not be less than the minimum circuit ampacity marked on the equipment in accordance with 440.4(B).
You said yourself that all the info we need is on the nameplate of the equipment, and that all the figuring has been done for us.I rest my case ... I will let this forum of prestigious and well qualified members to decide the outcome of my future reputation on this post.
Except for the fact that for like 30 plus years there has been almost no equipment that doesn't have a 75C terminal rating, particularly if over 30 amp rating to begin with. Your 15 to 30 amp devices- the small conductor rule of 240.4(D) kind of makes you use same size conductor that would be used for 60C rating in most cases, 430 and 440 applications being maybe the most common places you could possibly use actual 75C conductor ratings.Of course, if there is a nameplate, the higher terminal temperature ampacity rating of conductor insulation can be used. But it is a no-no for design because you never know.