So what "wood" you know?I got a 70% and I'm a carpenter.
I bet you saw that coming.
But don't fret about it.
So what "wood" you know?I got a 70% and I'm a carpenter.
I got a 70% and I'm a carpenter.
Maybe he was "board" in the carpenter's forum.So what "wood" you know?
Maybe he went against the grain?Maybe he was "board" in the carpenter's forum.
Planks a lot! You should get nailed for that one.Maybe he went against the grain?
Or got plane bored and nailed his colours to the mast?
Or just got screwed....
:grin:
I got a 70% and I'm a carpenter.
Consider me bored, punched and reamed.Planks a lot! You should get nailed for that one.
Well, I only got a 96. I missed the two questions about Coulomb. What's in a name?
I think a good basic understanding of theory is very important. Knowing how electricity works helps to choose the best way to improvise, which we have to do sometimes.
It does to the extent that reactances are involved, but for the theoretical discussions, we may presume linear DC operation.Or AC current? Or does it matter?
Electricians who do only residential new construction work (repetition) may do excellent work but may be over-whelmed when faced with complex troubleshooting and repair electrical work (analysis). The lack of a firm understanding of electrical theory can seriously contribute to why.
On the other hand, electricians who seriously focus on perfoming residential and/or commercial troubleshooting and repair work may not have done any new construction wiring for many years; having to research the respective parts of the Code prior to doing so. We need BOTH types of experienced electricians.
I received electrical theory training in high school vocational class, college, FAA maintenance training, the Navy nuclear power training, and at DOE nuclear power plant training courses. It's true that not having a sound theory understanding doesn't keep you from repetitively hooking up wires in a new construction work environment, but when you're doing corrective maintenance work on circuits that are defective and/or miss-wired, theoretical knowledge often is key to figuring out how to logically approach the situation, what to test, and how to keep from spending wasted hours running around in circles. Military training, at least back in the 70's and especially in the Navy nuclear field, was very comprehensive and serves as an excellent foundation on which to build years of actual field experience. Field experience alone, or with very little theoretical knowledge, can leave the electrician up a muddy creek without a paddle when he/she is faced with a complex troubleshooting and repair problem.
100120-1440 EST
The sum of the voltages around a closed path is zero. The sum of the currents at a node is zero.
Consider a battery with a single resistive load. You need to keep the polarity is mind. Suppose the Voltage from BAT-1 to BAT-2 (the two terminals) is 1.5 V and the voltage is written as VB12 = +1.5 V. Let the load voltage be labeled VL12 and also it is +1.5 V. If you relabel the load as VL21 then VL21 = -1.5 V.
Going the same direction around the loop VB12 + VL21 = 1.5 - 1.5 = 0.
Does this make sense or did I confuse the issue.
.
.
.
To simplify Zoig's explanation, the voltages dropped across the parts of a circuit (all of them: circuit voltage drop, load voltage, ect.) will equal the supply voltage. It's really much less profound than it sounds."In any electrical circuit, all the voltage will always be used up".
Can someone explain this please?
No. Presuming equal bulb characteristics, the voltage will be distributed among the loads equally. In your example, each bulb will receive (12/6) 2 volts, not it's rated voltage.So just as a example, you have christmas lights in series. 12v source. each bulb uses 1.5 v. you have 6 bulbs total. Isn't there 3volts left over?