If you’re using pvc, why go to the trouble of UF? Just use thwnUF in PVC to under the sink or behind the fridge.
NEC 340.12
Sometimes it might be difficult to run a complete raceway from source to intended target. By using the UF cable, you could just sleeve part of the run and the rest exposed, or in a place out of the way, that would be impossible to run conduit.If you’re using pvc, why go to the trouble of UF? Just use thwn
The AHJ around here will not accept UF exposed in any type of exposed application. Must be sleeved to enter any location from below grade. It’s just as easy to transition from the end of a conduit to a flex of some kind to complete the run instead of trying to deal with UF.Sometimes it might be difficult to run a complete raceway from source to intended target. By using the UF cable, you could just sleeve part of the run and the rest exposed, or in a place out of the way, that would be impossible to run conduit.
Is the inside of a cabinet exposed?The AHJ around here will not accept UF exposed in any type of exposed application. Must be sleeved to enter any location from below grade. It’s just as easy to transition from the end of a conduit to a flex of some kind to complete the run instead of trying to deal with UF.
Has the AHJ ever cited a code or is it just his/her wish?The AHJ around here will not accept UF exposed in any type of exposed application. Must be sleeved to enter any location from below grade. It’s just as easy to transition from the end of a conduit to a flex of some kind to complete the run instead of trying to deal with UF.
They have a local amendment that says no exposed UF.Has the AHJ ever cited a code or is it just his/her wish?
Yet it is allowed by the NEC. What is their reasoning and have they made the amendment accessible?They have a local amendment that says no exposed UF.
I don’t know the reason. Maybe they look at it the same as NM. Also the fact that I would never do it that way by using UF means it doesn’t really come into play on any installs I do.Yet it is allowed by the NEC. What is their reasoning and have they made the amendment accessible?
Regardless, IMO inside of a cabinet is not exactly exposed
@ActionDaveNM is allowed to be exposed. Have you actually seen the amendment or are they just telling you there is one.
Nothing wrong with that just harder to deal with UF and stripping it out in tight spaces. I would rather have a complete conduit of one kind or another from end to end. Yes I have seen the amendment.We often see NM sleeved in FMC in island cabinets; what's the problem with doing the same with UF?
I have seen it on a tablet that the inspector has that he uses to complete inspections on site. He pulled up a section of local requirements and it spelled it out to the word.
Unless it is somewhere in an official document we can see, it is no more than just something he could have put on his tablet and holds little weight.I have seen it on a tablet that the inspector has that he uses to complete inspections on site. He pulled up a section of local requirements and it spelled it out to the word.
I’m not trying to use or ever planning to use UF. Just commenting on others feed and how it relates to rules in my area.Unless it is somewhere in an official document we can see, it is no more than just something he could have put on his tablet and holds little weight.
UF is tougher than NM so it makes little sense that it would have more restrictions.
Can you post where we can access the rules in your area, they must be available to all that use them.I’m not trying to use or ever planning to use UF. Just commenting on others feed and how it relates to rules in my area.