Nice work WJR. I smell a protoge for emaler......maybe a possible replacement.
I didn?t know how to respond to this comment even though I knew it was made in jest. However, it got me to wondering how my signature would be perceived by members of this forum.
Over a year ago, Mike Holt made a comment to me that I should start posting on the forum since I am in the unique position of having created an estimating software program. Up until now I have been tentative at best. Over the past year I?ve made about 30 posts under the user name WJR. I never hid the fact that I developed an estimating program nor did I go out of my way to advertise it.
I just recently decided that I should fully disclose who I am and what I do. I feel that if I am offering my opinion or giving some small piece of advice in response to someone?s question, everyone should know where I?m coming from.
It?s important to me that you understand that I am not on this forum to promote TurboBid. Mike has already sent out a couple of newsletters regarding the program and has it listed, along with a demo, on his website.
I?m only going into this because I received a PM from a member stating that I should be careful in how I post. That I could be perceived in a negative way because I sell an estimating program. My feelings are that you guys are above that. So what if I developed an estimating program. I?m not here to sell it on this forum. I?m no different than anyone else. I want to be able to express my opinions, or to ask you for an opinion on all kinds of issues. I happen to be a contractor as well as a software developer. I?m also an electrician. I?m actually on a job right now, (Sunday @ 3:38 pm) trying to wrap up a trim. If I happen to refer to my program in a post it?s only because it?s how I estimate. I have no other reference point. What can I say? I enjoy talking about estimating. I have a passion for it and it?s what I do.
although i dont agree with not using unit price. You can still do it but you would need to factor in some of the variables
I agree with you. If you have a system for estimating with unit pricing and then applying factors, that?s cool.
I just like to use detailed estimates. I feel that it works better for me for a couple of reasons. In a detailed estimate, each assembly has a detailed list of material. The material is linked to a material database that allows the assemblies material prices to be easily updated. I like to be able to update the master material database and then have all of the assemblies updated from that.
I also like having a labor unit assigned to the material in each assembly. If I need to adjust material quantities in an assembly, the labor for that assembly is automatically adjusted. Also, when I incur labor rate increases, it?s not a problem. At the end of the estimate, I have a total labor budget for the job. It?s just a matter of using the new labor rates multiplied by the labor budget.
I can also generate a detailed material list broken into service, rough, trim, etc..
By having material and labor baselines, I can measure the accuracy of the estimates and make adjustments for future estimates.
Thanks for allowing me to express my thoughts.