scwirenut
Senior Member
- Location
- Sumter, South Carolina
is their code that requires a 4"sq on a empty (future) conduit system to have a cover
ultramegabob said:the firemarshall will gig you in my town if a box is open, they dont care if there is any wire in it.
nakulak said:110.12 A (2005) ?
480sparky said:Even with no firewalls that the raceway(s) go through?
480sparky said:That for KOs, not covers.
nakulak said:where exactly does it say that it doesn't apply to covers ?
Would not a box on a conduit going to a panel be an opening in a raceway?480sparky said:Where does it say it refers to covers? I don't see the word "Cover" anywhere in there. It says "Unused cable or raceway openings..."
Chris6245 said:Would not a box on a conduit going to a panel be an opening in a raceway?
480sparky said:I still would be hard-pressed to call that 4"x4" opening on a 4"x4" box a "cable or raceway opening". The little circles on the sides & back, yes.
alfiesauce said:In '08 they do not specify cable or raceway opening they just say Unused Opening.
The front of a box not filled with a device is an unused opening.
alfiesauce said:In '08 they do not specify cable or raceway opening they just say Unused Opening.
The front of a box not filled with a device is an unused opening.
stickboy1375 said:What about the screw holes in the box? They need to be filled also?![]()
Totally unenforceable.2002 NECH said:In the 2002 Code, 110.12(A) has been revised by changing the phrase unused openings to unused cable or raceway openings to clarify that openings such as weep holes are not required to be closed up. In addition, text from 370.18 of the 1999 NEC has been moved to the end of 110.12(A). (The reorganization of Chapter 3 in the 2002 NEC moved Article 370 to Article 314.)
scwirenut said:is their code that requires a 4"sq on a empty (future) conduit system to have a cover