- Location
- San Francisco Bay Area, CA, USA
- Occupation
- Electrical Engineer
I don't disagree that this is more likely the case than not, but as the EC, the responsibility for making sure that all code requirements are met at the installation is YOURS, not the mfrs. Ask any lawyer.I think the solution may well be that the manufacturer has it covered.
The installation instructions normally tells the electrician exactly what he has to provide. If they say just provide a 40A circuit, the manufacturer probably has the overload requirement covered somehow.
I just had a project that included telescoping bleachers, and the instructions just said to provide a circuit with a disconnect. (The disconnect was similar to the one someone else mentioned -behind the bleachers.)
I just dug into the spec. for that unit, and I found the control panel has a frequency inverter and overload protection for the motors. I'll bet the OP's is similar.
So should he dig deeper like you did and make absolutely sure this is already covered? Yes, you are right on that.
If it isn't, does the fact that the mfr didn't tell him that absolve him of responsibility? No.
Does the lack of, or poor quality of, information from mfrs result in duplicated efforts on behalf of the EC just to be sure? Absolutely, happens all the time, but it's the only way to ensure safety sometimes.
Last edited: