Bonding Junction Box

Status
Not open for further replies.

ed downey

Senior Member
Location
Missouri
If the specifications call for a separate grounding conductor to be installed in all EMT conduits does a junction box used for splicing conductors above a ceiling need to be bonded? I think that 250.4(A)(4) says yes it needs to be bonded and since the specifications say that you cannot use the EMT conduit as the grounding conductor then a #12 or larger conductor must be used for this purpose.

Let me know your thoughts.

-Ed
 
Re: Bonding Junction Box

You should bond, now if the idea is for an IG circuit, no bond, but either way you look at it the EMT is still your EGC, or part of the EGC if you bond. :cool: :cool:
 
Re: Bonding Junction Box

If an EGC (not an IG) is pulled and spliced within the box than it must be bonded to the box. If it passes through unbroken than it doesn't require bonding.
 
Re: Bonding Junction Box

If it passes through unbroken than it doesn't require bonding.
Trevor, 250.148 states that if there is a splice in the ungrounded conductors, then the EGC must be bonded to the box. That might not mean we have to break it and splice it to bond it, but chances are good that you do.

(I think all we lawyers can drop the "IG" bit for the rest of the thread, we have well established the IG exception. I nearly said it too.) :D
 
Re: Bonding Junction Box

George, you are correct. I meant to say if all of the conductors pass through the box than the bonding isn't required. Thanks for the correction.


Trevor
 
Re: Bonding Junction Box

I'm well qualified. I took a stand on the wrong side of this section recently, and got my shoe handed to me.

Don't ask me what that means. :cool:
 
Re: Bonding Junction Box

Originally posted by georgestolz:
I'm well qualified. I took a stand on the wrong side of this section recently, and got my shoe handed to me.

Don't ask me what that means. :D

[ January 07, 2006, 03:31 AM: Message edited by: LarryFine ]
 
Re: Bonding Junction Box

I meant to say if all of the conductors pass through the box than the bonding isn't required. Thanks for the correction.
The green wire must bond to the box as Bryan and George pointed out. Read 250.148, the circuit conductors can pass thru but any EGC, (unless it it to be used as an IG)must bond to the box.

[ January 09, 2006, 05:35 PM: Message edited by: Jhr ]
 
Re: Bonding Junction Box

Originally posted by Jhr:
I meant to say if all of the conductors pass through the box than the bonding isn't required. Thanks for the correction.
The green wire must bond to the box as Bryan and George pointed out. Read 250.148, the circuit conductors can pass thru but any EGC, (unless it it to be used as an IG)must bond to the box.
No, Trevor was correct in his statement. If you had a box where none of the ungrounded circuit conductors were spliced in the box, no splice (or bond to the box) would be required. ;)
 
Re: Bonding Junction Box

No, Trevor was correct in his statement. If you had a box where none of the ungrounded circuit conductors were spliced in the box, no splice (or bond to the box) would be required.
The good example of this would be a set of large conductors say 750Kcmil in EMT going through a pullbox. You wouldn't be required to bond the EGC to the box after the pull. You would simply put the cover on.
 
Re: Bonding Junction Box

Originally posted by infinity:
The good example of this would be a set of large conductors say 750Kcmil in EMT going through a pullbox. You wouldn't be required to bond the EGC to the box after the pull. You would simply put the cover on.
I agree and have simply put the cover on many times. :)
 
Re: Bonding Junction Box

Prior to the 2002 code, you had to bond the EGC to the metallic box even if the circuit conductors were not spliced or terminated within the box.
Don
 
Re: Bonding Junction Box

The good example of this would be a set of large conductors say 750Kcmil in EMT going through a pullbox. You wouldn't be required to bond the EGC to the box after the pull. You would simply put the cover on.
Well I must be missing something, give the code reference so I can correct my way of interpeting 250.148. :confused: And why wouldn't you bond the EGC for the 750kcmil, it wouldn't be that hard, a big pull box, plenty of room, for the say a #2 thhn EGC? :confused:

[ January 10, 2006, 08:35 PM: Message edited by: Jhr ]
 
Re: Bonding Junction Box

Originally posted by Jhr:
Well I must be missing something, give the code reference so I can correct my way of interpeting 250.148. :)

250.4(A)(3) is the key to your thinking, Jhr. Yes, the box must be bonded, because 250.4(A)(3) says so. But 250.148's opinion on how it should be done is mute, since there are no spliced circuit conductors in the box. Just because .148 can't be applied doesn't relieve the requirement that the box must be bonded in general.

And why wouldn't you bond the EGC for the 750kcmil, it wouldn't be that hard, a big pull box, plenty of room, for the say a #2 thhn EGC? ;)
 
Re: Bonding Junction Box

Originally posted by Jhr:
The good example of this would be a set of large conductors say 750Kcmil in EMT going through a pullbox. You wouldn't be required to bond the EGC to the box after the pull. You would simply put the cover on.
Well I must be missing something, give the code reference so I can correct my way of interpeting 250.148. :confused: And why wouldn't you bond the EGC for the 750kcmil,
First to be clear the metal can must be bonded, but that can be accomplished through the metal raceway.

When you have a can that is only being used as a pull box you usually do not leave slack at it, the feeders or branch circuits simply pass through it with no splicing.

Requiring the EGC to be connected to the can in that application would be like requiring the EGC to be connected to the EMT it passes through.

You can of courses choose to bond the can to the EGC but I do not see what that will do to increase safety.
 
Re: Bonding Junction Box

Requiring the EGC to be connected to the can in that application would be like requiring the EGC to be connected to the EMT it passes through.

You can of courses choose to bond the can to the EGC but I do not see what that will do to increase safety.
Ok, but lets say I'm installing some underground circuits: 3/4" PVC, metal 6x6x4 Nema 3 J-Boxes and in two of theses boxes the ungrounded conductors pass thru no splice, do I not bond the EGC to the box :confused: . Besides the example of the 750 Kcmil is way off target, those type of runs are usually reserved for service applications.I don't know but I think we got way off the original question and there he should bond.

[ January 11, 2006, 09:15 PM: Message edited by: Jhr ]
 
Re: Bonding Junction Box

Ok, but lets say I'm installing some underground circuits: 3/4" PVC, metal 6x6x4 Nema 3 J-Boxes and in two of theses boxes the ungrounded conductors pass thru no splice, do I not bond the EGC to the box . Besides the example of the 750 Kcmil is way off target, those type of runs are usually reserved for service applications.I don't know but I think we got way off the original question and there he should bond.
The metal box must be bonded. If the conduit is EMT and the conductors only pass through then no connection to the EGC (if there is one) is required. If the conduit is PVC then the box must be bonded to the EGC since the raceway will not be an EGC.


I would disagree with your assumption that large feeder conductors such as 750Kcmil would be only for services. We install 500,600, and 750 Kcmil feeder conductors on a regular basis. Many times we have run 10 parallel sets of 600Kcmil conductors for a 4000 amp feeder and when they simply pass through a pull box no connection is made to the EGC. None is required.
 
Re: Bonding Junction Box

I would disagree with your assumption that large feeder conductors such as 750Kcmil would be only for services.
Now come on don't misqoute me I never said the larger conductors are "ONLY USED FOR SERVICES", but if you feel the EGC dosent have to be bonded to the box fine, but where does it say in the code, 250.148 also says circuit conductors that are been supported by the box, what does that mean.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top