E EdwardT New member Location Seattle, WA, USA Aug 20, 2017 #21 kwired said: I haven't seen one of those devices in a while, but seems they need more depth then the box in question has. Click to expand... Yes, I think it needs more depth.
kwired said: I haven't seen one of those devices in a while, but seems they need more depth then the box in question has. Click to expand... Yes, I think it needs more depth.
J JFletcher Senior Member Location Williamsburg, VA Aug 21, 2017 #22 kwired said: I haven't seen one of those devices in a while, but seems they need more depth then the box in question has. Click to expand... They dont need boxes at all, tho they are ~1.5" deep
kwired said: I haven't seen one of those devices in a while, but seems they need more depth then the box in question has. Click to expand... They dont need boxes at all, tho they are ~1.5" deep
kwired Electron manager Location NE Nebraska Occupation EC Aug 21, 2017 #23 JFletcher said: They dont need boxes at all, tho they are ~1.5" deep Click to expand... I know they don't need boxes, I was trying to point out they likely are deeper then the box in the OP though, which is something one should only want to use because of a shallow wall cavity to start with.
JFletcher said: They dont need boxes at all, tho they are ~1.5" deep Click to expand... I know they don't need boxes, I was trying to point out they likely are deeper then the box in the OP though, which is something one should only want to use because of a shallow wall cavity to start with.