wwhitney
Senior Member
- Location
- Berkeley, CA
- Occupation
- Retired
Bear with me, I got a little confused and have to retract post #16 (which should have referenced 210.20 rather than 210.19).But you still cannot load an overcurrent protective device at 100% for continuous loads so in effect the 125% rule is still there.
424.3 (2017 NEC) or 424.4 (2020 NEC and later) could just say "fixed electric space-heating equipment shall be considered continuous loads." If it did, that would mean considered a continuous load for all purposes--service conductor and OCPD sizing, feeder conductor and OCPD sizing, and branch cirucit conductor and OCPD sizing.
But 2017 NEC 424.3 doesn't say that. It says that for "branch-circuit sizing," they shall be considered continuous load. That clearly means that for service conductor and OCPD sizing, and for feeder conductor and OCPD sizing, you don't have to consider the load continuous. And for branch-circuit conductor sizing you do have to consider the load continuous, as branch-circuit conductors are part of the branch circuit.
What about the branch circuit OCPD, is it part of the branch-circuit or not? If the answer is no, because in the definition of branch circuit the word "between" is not inclusive of that endpoint, then 2017 NEC 424.3 on "branch circuit sizing" does not apply, as what you are sizing is not part of the branch circuit. Which means when we apply 210.20 on sizing for OCPD protecting the branch circuit, we don't have to consider the load continuous.
And that's clearly the result under the new wording for the 2020 NEC. Given that the committee statement asserted that the change from the 2017 NEC to the 2020 NEC was editorial, that was apparently the intention for the 2017 NEC as well.
A distinction that's usually of no consequence, but occassionally could be. For example, in Article 705 on interconnected power sources, one of the rules for determining if the busbar of a panelboard with multiple sources of supply is properly protected or not counts the actual rating of the OCPDs installed in that panelboard. So sizing the OCPD for fixed electric space heating at the load, rather than at 125% of the load, could make a difference between complying with that portion of 705 or not.
Cheers, Wayne
