I don't think I ever installed a breaker with more than 3 digits...:lol: Even if the breaker was rated 90C at the terminals the equipment would also need to be rated 90C
Would the question now be is this a molded case beaker which to my knowledge 2500a is the largest or a power breaker?Remember it is the termination not the lug.
Most molded case breakers are listed to UL489, which pretty much prevents them from having terminations which allow conductors to be sized based on the 90C insulation.
Power circuit breakers, like those in drawout switchgear, are listed under different standards and rarely have terminations made directly to the breaker itself. This 'lug landing pad type' of construction is almost always available for use with conductors sized based on 90C.
Enclosure design also impacts the termination rating.
Don't forget the enclosure.Would the question now be is this a molded case beaker which to my knowledge 2500a is the largest or a power breaker?
Are you referring to a 100% rated breaker?Don't forget the enclosure.
I don't believe UL Listed switchboards have terminations for 90C sized conductors, unlike ANSI switchgear which commonly has them.
That is correct. But continuous loads do not have to be factored at 125%. That could amount to better than the factored value at 90?C ampacity for an all or nearly all continuous load.Are you referring to a 100% rated breaker?
If I remember correctly when the UL489 breaker is listed for application to 100% rating yes the enclosure must be suitable for application at 100% in addition to the wire be rated 90degC but applied per 75degC...
You are correct when I overlooked adding that note. When sizing the wire it is based upon not 100%+125% as you would with a common 80% rated breaker but 100%+100% which gives one an opportunity to optimize the wire size thus the requirement for 90degC rated wire. Actually, an 80% breaker is no different that a 100% breaker excerpt for the addition of a heat rize test which allows it to be UL listed for a 100% application.That is correct. But continuous loads do not have to be factored at 125%. That could amount to better than the factored value at 90?C ampacity for an all or nearly all continuous load.
Even if the terminations were 90deg, I've never seen a breaker in an enclosure that was tested / listed for 90 degree termination ampacity, even ANSI type.midway thru the thread that (info) all came back to me. I have never encountered a 100% rated and the brain cells were fuzzy. Thanks
I think that a stand-alone enclosed hang-it-on-the-wall 100% rated breaker will often have 90C rated terminations, usually Cu only. But... you STILL would have to size the cables for the 75C rating. I can't think of any scenario in which you can SIZE the cables going into any breaker using the 90C column, regardless of the rating of the terminations etc.Even if the terminations were 90deg, I've never seen a breaker in an enclosure that was tested / listed for 90 degree termination ampacity, even ANSI type.
I think that a stand-alone enclosed hang-it-on-the-wall 100% rated breaker will often have 90C rated terminations, usually Cu only. But... you STILL would have to size the cables for the 75C rating. I can't think of any scenario in which you can SIZE the cables going into any breaker using the 90C column, regardless of the rating of the terminations etc.
Sometimes I wonder if the 90C column should even exist, except as an exception with the rules spelled out as to the ONLY times those ratings can be used. This issue seems to cause more confusion than it's worth.
It was already proposed, but the CMP rejected the idea....Sometimes I wonder if the 90C column should even exist, except as an exception with the rules spelled out as to the ONLY times those ratings can be used. This issue seems to cause more confusion than it's worth.
EDIT: Nevermind, I see the proposal also would've removed the ability to use the 90? for derating which is no bueno.Table 310.15(B)(16)
Submitter: Steven R. Musial, II, CJL Engineering
Recommendation: Add the following note at the end of the title block:
(Note: For electrical systems at or below 600 volts, use only the 60?C and 75?C columns per Temperature LimitationsArticle 110.14(C)(1)(a) and (C)(1)(b). The 90?C column applies to electrical systems in excess of 600 volts.)
Substantiation: There is much confusion regarding the 90?C column in this table. Lack of understanding can result in improperly sized conductors in electrical system sat and below 600 volts.
Panel Meeting Action: Reject
Panel Statement: The ampacity of cable must be limited by termination ampacity as stated in 310.15(3)(B). In addition, there may be terminations that are rated above 75 degree C and many large size cables are directly connected to equipment without the use of terminals. The 90 degree C column can be used in some cases for 600 volt systems. The 90 degree C ampacity column can be used for derating purposes or equipment rated 90 degree C.