Buck Boost Transformer

You may be right that the ship could be 480. Especially if the ships plug is 480. A standard 250 volt plug would be sufficient with the high leg system. Didn’t look up the plug #, but is probable pin and sleeve. If the ship has transformers in the electrical room, most likely it is 480, same with the onboard generator could be checked. With all the bad info they have given you, might be time to run from this job! LOL!
 
What a confusing story, from a building to a ship. from 208/120 utility supply, needing a buck boost to 240 1Φ, then finding out it has a center tapped 3Φ 240 delta utility service, to a listed 200A 480V 4W shore receptacle. with no neutral provided at the receptacle.
Then no mention of the additional loads that were to be added? Then claiming the ship runs off of a 240 V 3Φ ungrounded system but has some 120V single Φ loads.

Does this boat ever leave lake Michigan? Having a 480V plug on a 240V boat sounds like a accident waiting to happen if it leaves the dock it is stationed at.

Sounds to me like it has a ungrounded 3Φ 240V supply, then it should have some ground fault detection on board. i think it's common for larger boats to have ungrounded systems with ground fault detection systems onboard.

Sounds like it needs a lot more investigation before you start changing panels and adding transformers and equipment.

my first concern would be a 480 3Φ ship to shore chord and plug for a 240 3Φ boat. That could be very detrimental at the wrong port.

1772161399573.png

 
  • the SHORE TIE receptacle is as follows:
    • 3P4W 3Ø480 DBRS240420000 DS2404MP000 (NOT 277/480)-- This is 3 Pole (L1, L2, L3 + N as opposed to a L1, L2, L3, + G) and currently no neutral is connected to this receptacle but they werent having any issues before.
Given the above information, since the shore tie receptacle is rated to handle 480V, in theory there should be no problem connecting that receptacle to a 3Phase 120/240 system right ?
Per the catalog page, that receptacle is 3P4W straight 480V, implying L1, L2, L3 + G, no neutral.
1772193538374.png
( https://pim.galco.com/Manufacturer/...ment/Catalog Page/dbrs240420000_901233_cp.pdf )

There are two separate pieces of receptacle 'voltage', the actual voltage rating of the components and the configuration. (As an analogy think about THHN wire insulation. The wire has an insulation voltage rating of 600V. The wire comes in lots of different colors, and the colors are the configuration.)

It is perfectly fine to use a receptacle with a voltage rating of 480V to supply 240V.

It may be a code issue and it is always a design issue to use a 480V configuration to supply equipment designed for 240V. The NEC requirement is 406.4(F), and it just limits you to 1 voltage per receptacle configuration in an given facility. If you want to use 480V plugs for your 240V devices in your factory, you can, as long as you don't also use those 480V plugs for 480V devices.

But if you put a 480V plug on a device that moves around (eg a ship), then there is always a risk that someone will plug it into a 480V receptacle (say at a different port). I don't know if there are marine codes that require the plug configuration to match the voltage, but this is certainly a design issue.

UTILITY - 3PHASE 120/240 HIGH LEG (208) CLOSED DELTA (3 Bank Transformer) Verified the Fused Disco Voltage Readings myself ALL Line to Line Voltages Read 240V between each-other, A/B phase 120V to N, and B phase 208V to N.

LOAD (From Disco Next To Meter -> 80 Feet To Shore Tie Receptacle Rated At 200A, 400V 3P ) - The load is a shore tie receptacle that ONLY takes L1, L2, L3 (no Neutral, not even pulled from disco to receptacle).

Good on you for going out there to see what is actually going on. You say there is not neutral pulled from disconnect to receptacle. Was there a wire EGC pulled, or is the conduit used for the EGC?

  • BACKGROUND - this shore tie receptacle feeds a small docked ship (NOT A Building, i am sorry gents). The ship has offices, a galley, lounge and sleeping quarters and outlets. It also has pumps, fridges, heaters other 3 phase equipment. Now the ship has had some issues while being docked (issues started happening 6 months ago, from the onboard personnel i talked to, they stated that they have been onboard for 4 years and nothing has changed on their end, no new construction, no upgraded wiring, any reconfiguration of sorts except one thing. While underway one of their batteries exploded and they had to emergency dock. That's all the intel i have)
Ok, so you are trying to understand how the existing electrical system could have 'worked fine', but now does not. As best you can tell, only 240V L-L circuit conductors were provided, but the ship has 120V loads that worked fine.

  • SHIP ELECTRICAL SPECS - The ship operates on 240 VAC phase-to-phase and 120 VAC phase-to-ground electrical service. The existing city power configuration consists of a 120/120/208 VAC Wye/Delta transformer configuration.
You cannot have 240V L-L 120V L-N _symmetric 3 phase_ power. You can have:
240V L-L, 120V L-N single phase power
240V L-L, 139V L-N three phase power (balanced wye 240V 3 phase)
208V L-L, 120V L-N three phase power (balanced wye 208/120V 3 phase)
240V L-L, 120V L-N, 120V L-N, 208V L-N three phase power (high leg delta, exactly what you've measured from the utility)
  • the SHORE TIE receptacle is as follows:
    • 3P4W 3Ø480 DBRS240420000 DS2404MP000 -- This is 3 Pole (L1, L2, L3 + N as opposed to a L1, L2, L3, + G) and currently no neutral is connected to this receptacle but they werent having any issues before.

**** Right now im still waiting for an email or phone call from the PM to clarify the smorgasbord of false information, in the meantime, i owe you guys an apology. My apologies for wasting your time and mental effort with the wrong premise. If i was in your state Id be more than happy to buy you a beer or lunch to offset any negative energy yall throw out my way ***

My guess, based on what you've described:

The utility service is 240V high leg delta with a neutral center tap. The ship expects 240V high leg delta with two 120V L-N legs. If you get to the ship you can confirm this if all of the 120V circuits are very specifically on 2 of the 3 phases. The ship was improperly using the EGC as the neutral, and over time the EGC has decayed. And now they are experiencing problems with the high impedance neutral.

My (lower likelihood) second guess is that the ship expects 120/240V _single phase_ power, and that one of the poles on that 3 pole receptacle was used as the neutral. But someone did some work on the service and noticed that one of the 'phase' conductors was landed on a neutral terminal, and switched it to the unused high leg.

Another possibility is that the ship owners have decided that they want to derive the 120V supplies using a transformer so that they can plug the ship into a straight 240V supply of any grounding (high leg, corner grounded or ungrounded) and not have to worry about the specific dock supply configuration. They may even want some sort of fancy transformer that can take 240V or 380V or 480V or whatever and provide as stable 240/120V 3 phase high leg on the ship.
 
You may be right that the ship could be 480. Especially if the ships plug is 480. A standard 250 volt plug would be sufficient with the high leg system. Didn’t look up the plug #, but is probable pin and sleeve. If the ship has transformers in the electrical room, most likely it is 480, same with the onboard generator could be checked. With all the bad info they have given you, might be time to run from this job! LOL!
so they do have on board transformers for each shore power leg. I could not get the information from them yesterday due to the exercises/maintenance being performed down there and currently waiting on that information to come through. I did get the following additional information for the ship (ship engine is a CAT 3304 configured for 120/240 3P and max load of 160A).

What a confusing story, from a building to a ship. from 208/120 utility supply, needing a buck boost to 240 1Φ, then finding out it has a center tapped 3Φ 240 delta utility service, to a listed 200A 480V 4W shore receptacle. with no neutral provided at the receptacle.
Then no mention of the additional loads that were to be added? Then claiming the ship runs off of a 240 V 3Φ ungrounded system but has some 120V single Φ loads.

Does this boat ever leave lake Michigan? Having a 480V plug on a 240V boat sounds like a accident waiting to happen if it leaves the dock it is stationed at.

Sounds to me like it has a ungrounded 3Φ 240V supply, then it should have some ground fault detection on board. i think it's common for larger boats to have ungrounded systems with ground fault detection systems onboard.
Something like that, we checked one of the onboard AC control panels and took readings between legs everything check out, then took readings between each leg AND metal wall of ship, all metallic parts of ship are either grounded or bonded. Sorry not sure how that works, but those readings indicate that they do have some ground fault detection on board.
It is perfectly fine to use a receptacle with a voltage rating of 480V to supply 240V.

But if you put a 480V plug on a device that moves around (eg a ship), then there is always a risk that someone will plug it into a 480V receptacle (say at a different port). I don't know if there are marine codes that require the plug configuration to match the voltage, but this is certainly a design issue.



Good on you for going out there to see what is actually going on. You say there is not neutral pulled from disconnect to receptacle. Was there a wire EGC pulled, or is the conduit used for the EGC?
No EGC, conduit is in PVC....
My guess, based on what you've described:

The utility service is 240V high leg delta with a neutral center tap. The ship expects 240V high leg delta with two 120V L-N legs. If you get to the ship you can confirm this if all of the 120V circuits are very specifically on 2 of the 3 phases. The ship was improperly using the EGC as the neutral, and over time the EGC has decayed. And now they are experiencing problems with the high impedance neutral.

My (lower likelihood) second guess is that the ship expects 120/240V _single phase_ power, and that one of the poles on that 3 pole receptacle was used as the neutral. But someone did some work on the service and noticed that one of the 'phase' conductors was landed on a neutral terminal, and switched it to the unused high leg.

Another possibility is that the ship owners have decided that they want to derive the 120V supplies using a transformer so that they can plug the ship into a straight 240V supply of any grounding (high leg, corner grounded or ungrounded) and not have to worry about the specific dock supply configuration. They may even want some sort of fancy transformer that can take 240V or 380V or 480V or whatever and provide as stable 240/120V 3 phase high leg on the ship.

ONE LAST ITEM TO MENTION: On the signal panel, we took readings L-L and L-N on all legs. A phase (L1-N) read 208V instead of B phase. Could this be the cause and a phase rotation needed ?
 
so they do have on board transformers for each shore power leg. I could not get the information from them yesterday due to the exercises/maintenance being performed down there and currently waiting on that information to come through. I did get the following additional information for the ship (ship engine is a CAT 3304 configured for 120/240 3P and max load of 160A).


Something like that, we checked one of the onboard AC control panels and took readings between legs everything check out, then took readings between each leg AND metal wall of ship, all metallic parts of ship are either grounded or bonded. Sorry not sure how that works, but those readings indicate that they do have some ground fault detection on board.



No EGC, conduit is in PVC....


ONE LAST ITEM TO MENTION: On the signal panel, we took readings L-L and L-N on all legs. A phase (L1-N) read 208V instead of B phase. Could this be the cause and a phase rotation needed ?

Let's just review:

You have a utility that supplies a 240V high leg delta to a fused disconnect. At the service you can measure 240V L-L and 120V, 120V, 208V L-N

Then you have L1, L2, and L3 to a shore power receptacle. The conduit is PVC and they didn't put a neutral and they didn't pull a wire EGC.

On the ship they have a generator configured to produce 240V 3 phase, with no information about a neutral or grounding.

On one of the ship panels you measured 240V L-L and 208V, 120V, 120V but you get the 208V on A phase rather than B phase.

IMHO it is still unknown what is going on, and too early to say what the answer is.

If you have a 240/120V high leg panel and the 208V is on the wrong bus, then a bunch of 120V loads will get hit with 208V and the solution is a phase rotation. But you don't know _why_ the 208V is on the wrong bus. You said that things weren't changed on the ship.

You've also described an installation where there isn't a defined neutral or EGC from the utility to the ship, so I'd think that the utility neutral isn't part of the picture on the ship.

There may be a transformer that you don't yet know about, or there may be a incidental path back to the utility neutral. You may have a floating neutral and the loads just happen to give you the 208V. Until you know where the neutral is coming from, you don't know what needs to be fixed.

Right now, IMHO, there are still unknown bits of the story.
 
ONE LAST ITEM TO MENTION: On the signal panel, we took readings L-L and L-N on all legs. A phase (L1-N) read 208V instead of B phase. Could this be the cause and a phase rotation needed ?
They most likely have a rotation monitor built into the ship electrical, so it will probably alarm, or has a shunt trip breaker to prevent the shore power input breaker from closing. It would be extremely critical that the high leg be maintained on the same phase. If rotation change is needed, swap the other two phases only.
 
They most likely have a rotation monitor built into the ship electrical, so it will probably alarm, or has a shunt trip breaker to prevent the shore power input breaker from closing. It would be extremely critical that the high leg be maintained on the same phase. If rotation change is needed, swap the other two phases only.

Careful:
1) If you have a high leg system and rotation change is needed, than you should only swap the other two phases and leave the high leg where it is. Just as @hillbilly1 says.
2) If you have a high leg system and the 208V is on the wrong leg, then you need to 'rotate' all three phases to move the 208V to the correct leg without changing rotation.

Phase rotation and which phase is the high leg are two different things; don't screw up one while fixing the other!
 
Let's just review:

You have a utility that supplies a 240V high leg delta to a fused disconnect. At the service you can measure 240V L-L and 120V, 120V, 208V L-N
YES
Then you have L1, L2, and L3 to a shore power receptacle. The conduit is PVC and they didn't put a neutral and they didn't pull a wire EGC.
CORRECT
On the ship they have a generator configured to produce 240V 3 phase, with no information about a neutral or grounding.
Correct, But they do have a Ground Detector Panel where we measured voltages,
On one of the ship panels you measured 240V L-L and 208V, 120V, 120V but you get the 208V on A phase rather than B phase.
YES
IMHO it is still unknown what is going on, and too early to say what the answer is.

If you have a 240/120V high leg panel and the 208V is on the wrong bus, then a bunch of 120V loads will get hit with 208V and the solution is a phase rotation. But you don't know _why_ the 208V is on the wrong bus. You said that things weren't changed on the ship.

You've also described an installation where there isn't a defined neutral or EGC from the utility to the ship, so I'd think that the utility neutral isn't part of the picture on the ship.

There may be a transformer that you don't yet know about, or there may be a incidental path back to the utility neutral. You may have a floating neutral and the loads just happen to give you the 208V. Until you know where the neutral is coming from, you don't know what needs to be fixed.

Right now, IMHO, there are still unknown bits of the story.
Update, i spoke with their Electrician (His electrical knowledge is limited to marine applications) who is another person responsible for the SOW. He states that:

1. the ship only takes L1, L2, L3 120/240 and does not require a neutral. Furthermore, the majority of the damage is restricted to 240V loads on the ship, mainly the steering.

2. The shore tie receptacle goes to a transfer switch (shore power | ship power) --> then it a 240v panel --> feeds downstream to 3 step down transformers which feed two 120V panels (each leg 60v each) which provides 120v power to their barge area and offices

3. High leg was intentionally switched to Phase A because original configuration (High Leg being on Phase B caused even more issues)

4. He believes that replacing existing transformer to new 120/208y and using a buck boost transformer to get 120/240 will eliminate the onboard ship issues due to effectively eliminating the High Leg causing any further issues.

**** i do not know if that will fix the issue but im at the point where THIS ^^ is what they want and what they are paying for. Time to draft my liability form to remove me from any future issues arising from the install ****
 
He believes that replacing existing transformer to new 120/208y and using a buck boost transformer to get 120/240 will eliminate the onboard ship issues due to effectively eliminating the High Leg causing any further issues.
He is wrong.
Using a buck-boost autotransformer in a delta configuration will create one low leg and two high legs.
 
YES

CORRECT

Correct, But they do have a Ground Detector Panel where we measured voltages,

YES


Update, i spoke with their Electrician (His electrical knowledge is limited to marine applications) who is another person responsible for the SOW. He states that:

1. the ship only takes L1, L2, L3 120/240 and does not require a neutral. Furthermore, the majority of the damage is restricted to 240V loads on the ship, mainly the steering.

2. The shore tie receptacle goes to a transfer switch (shore power | ship power) --> then it a 240v panel --> feeds downstream to 3 step down transformers which feed two 120V panels (each leg 60v each) which provides 120v power to their barge area and offices

3. High leg was intentionally switched to Phase A because original configuration (High Leg being on Phase B caused even more issues)

4. He believes that replacing existing transformer to new 120/208y and using a buck boost transformer to get 120/240 will eliminate the onboard ship issues due to effectively eliminating the High Leg causing any further issues.

**** i do not know if that will fix the issue but im at the point where THIS ^^ is what they want and what they are paying for. Time to draft my liability form to remove me from any future issues arising from the install ****
You are probably correct, it will not fix the issue, and moving the high leg, was not the problem, they probably have a fault that just moved. They need to just change to a delta-delta isolation transformer with a ground detector on that end. With the buck/boost configuration, they will still show a fault to ground, even though it’s not 208 anymore. In fact, their ground dectector is probably not installed or functioning correctly which is probably why they had the fire.
 
He is wrong.
Using a buck-boost autotransformer in a delta configuration will create one low leg and two high legs.
just to clarify, the utility service is an open delta 3P 120/240 with high leg 208.
they want to replace the existing to a new utility service 3P 120/208y

He is suggesting to use a buck-boost autotransformer in a wye configuration.
 
Update, i spoke with their Electrician (His electrical knowledge is limited to marine applications) who is another person responsible for the SOW. He states that:

1. the ship only takes L1, L2, L3 120/240 and does not require a neutral. Furthermore, the majority of the damage is restricted to 240V loads on the ship, mainly the steering.

Ok, this is a bit wrong, because you can't have 3 phase 120/240 without a neutral. The specification of 120/204 implies a neutral, probably grounded. The fact that neither neutral nor EGC was pulled with the service conductors (which is a code violation) implies that they only need straight 240V ungrounded power.

2. The shore tie receptacle goes to a transfer switch (shore power | ship power) --> then it a 240v panel --> feeds downstream to 3 step down transformers which feed two 120V panels (each leg 60v each) which provides 120v power to their barge area and offices

Okay, 'technical power' for the 120V loads. No 120V loads are on the 240V part of the system, which is good.

3. High leg was intentionally switched to Phase A because original configuration (High Leg being on Phase B caused even more issues)

4. He believes that replacing existing transformer to new 120/208y and using a buck boost transformer to get 120/240 will eliminate the onboard ship issues due to effectively eliminating the High Leg causing any further issues.

**** i do not know if that will fix the issue but im at the point where THIS ^^ is what they want and what they are paying for. Time to draft my liability form to remove me from any future issues arising from the install ****

If the utility changes the service to 208/120V (small pedantic point: for 3 phase you give the L-L voltage first) and then you use bb transformers to get to 240V, you cannot have 120/240. Your either get a nice balanced 240/139V system (made with 3 BB transformers in wye configuration, or a 3 phase wye autotransformer), or you get an unbalanced 120V 145V 145V L-N (made with 2 BB transformers in a delta configuration).

I don't think this change will actually help with the issue. The ship has a ground reference of some sort, but it isn't wired from the service. I think you are seeing problems caused by the lack of bonding between service and local ground.
 
just to clarify, the utility service is an open delta 3P 120/240 with high leg 208.
they want to replace the existing to a new utility service 3P 120/208y

He is suggesting to use a buck-boost autotransformer in a wye configuration.
Does the utility have enough lines for a wye? Usually an open delta is used if only not all three phases are present at the pole. They may have to bring in another line at additional costs.
 
just to clarify, the utility service is an open delta 3P 120/240 with high leg 208.
they want to replace the existing to a new utility service 3P 120/208y

He is suggesting to use a buck-boost autotransformer in a wye configuration.
This will not change anything.
You are still going to have unbalanced L-N and L-G voltages, 2 of which will be higher than 120V.

If you want to go from a grounded source to an ungrounded source, you will need an isolation transformer.
 
After all this confusion, I would want to disconnect the shore power, and power the ship off it's internal generator, then measure the system voltages right at the generator output to the transfer switch, this should be the real indication of what the ship is designed to operate from. Only then would you be sure of what the shore power should be.

here is some reading material on the subject to familiarize yourself with ship system designs.


 
Top