RSquirrel
Member
- Location
- Watsonville, CA, USA
- Occupation
- Mechanical Engineer (retired/consulting)
I am replacing a ‘70’s Zinsco breaker panel with Square-D. Whoever originally installed the panel, used “butterfly” cable clamps (see attachment) at the top knockouts, and oriented them such that the clamp “wings” are inside the panel and the screws are outside (above) the panel with the screw-heads pointed toward the back of the panel. This suggests that the clamps were “tilted” into place from above the panel, and tightened from the back of the panel, before the sheet-rock was in place.
For the replacement panel, I would like to orient the new butterfly clamps with their wings outside (above) the panel and the screws inside the panel, with the screw-heads pointed toward the front of the panel (i.e. accessible from the open front of the panel). Other than comments stating that both methods have been used, I was unable to find anything on the web or in the 2008 NEC that prohibits this installation method. The knockouts are well forward of the back of the box, so bottoming of screws would not be an issue. See the attachment for a comparison between the two methods.
Q1. Does my proposed method violate any NEC articles?
Q2. What (if any) are the negatives for my proposed method?
For the replacement panel, I would like to orient the new butterfly clamps with their wings outside (above) the panel and the screws inside the panel, with the screw-heads pointed toward the front of the panel (i.e. accessible from the open front of the panel). Other than comments stating that both methods have been used, I was unable to find anything on the web or in the 2008 NEC that prohibits this installation method. The knockouts are well forward of the back of the box, so bottoming of screws would not be an issue. See the attachment for a comparison between the two methods.
Q1. Does my proposed method violate any NEC articles?
Q2. What (if any) are the negatives for my proposed method?