Re: CAN LIGHTS INSTALLED IN A GARAGE
Originally posted by Cheryl Smith:
Apauling said "No" as well as one of the other respondents and that's what I was looking for.
Yeah, I think that's a big "no" universally. Even when it comes to wall-spacing requirements, and things of that nature that are essentially what the rough inspection is designed to catch and inspect, quite often a violation is more visible after sheetrock. The violation exists prior to the Certificate of Occupancy being issued, so the AHJ has every right not to sign off, regardless of whether or not they could have caught it on the rough.
However, it is human to makes mistakes and this doesn't mean that my EC all of a sudden became an "unqualified" EC because of it.
No kidding. I am surprised that noone has come out and said it, so I will:
I would have made the same mistake. I'm glad you came along, Cheryl, because someday I will be faced with the same unusual request, and am now the wiser by you sharing this event with us.
The only comment that I found misplaced was the one regarding "The city won't be writing checks to the Smith family anytime soon". Huh???... What does the Smith family have to do with this?
I think that was an honest mistake. A hasty read of your posts may make you look like a typical homeowner, not a professional non-electrician. In the heat of the moment, an opportunity for wit overcame a clear reading of the facts, I think.
IMO, the GC is at fault. The contruction and soundness of fire-walls falls under building codes, not the NEC. The GC should have seen those 6" penetrations through his firewall and pitched a fit prior to rough inspection, IMO. A well-educated EC could have brought it to his attention, but shouldn't be expected to, IMO. Since I am the first to speak along these lines, I am probably wrong, but compelled to throw that out there to chew on.
It seems like electricians tend to have to babysit GC's operations in many cases. "Hey, the framer's haven't framed in the medicine cabinets, they didn't frame for the 'den' option that's on the extras, there's supposed to be a slider ILO a swinging door..." Goes with the job, I guess.
For fire-blocking and firewall-minded inspectors, it should have been noticed, too. That's surprising. But the AHJ has zero liability in this case.