I know this is a test question and I agree the calc should be done with the given information. The goal in a test is to give the answer the examiner wants to hear. So, yes, I agree that using 460V for the calc is correct. I got all of that.
... if you use 480V instead of 460V you get 129.91 and you could use #1 for that. But since he said answer key said 1/0, they must have meant to use the actual 460V in the question. That would give you the 1/0 answer. (135.55A)
I would look at that differently. If one were to use 480V instead of 460V, the kvars go up by the ratio of the square of the voltages, and curent goes up by the ratio of the voltages. So at 480V, the cap current would be 105A and 135% is 141A. With respect to the test question, it wouldn't change anything - wire size and OCP remain the same.
Now that we are by that, here is my comment/question - Consider actual design/installation issues (as opposed to a test question) - these are two I have actually seen:
If one had 600V rated caps and the installation system voltage was indeed at 480V, this pushes the kvars down to 64% rated value and the cap current down to about 80%.
The second was 7200V rated caps applied at 6600V. This drops the kvar rating to 84 % and cap current to 92%.
The wire size difference, saving a few bucks on copper, wouldn't matter to me, but I would tend to lower the OCP if I could. My thinking is if a fuse blows, there is no cap to save - It died. One just wants to get the fire out as quickly as possible to limit the damage.
The change in kvars could easily be significant and could well require a change to get the required power factor correction (or harmonic reduction).
So, the question is (for those that have an opinion) how would you handle this?
When I saw these two, in each case I noted what was done, and didn't particularly agree with the solutions. Since I wasn't getting paid to look at that part of the installation, I didn't say much about it. However, I am interested in what others think.
ice