Looking at this from a logical point of view and not necessarily from a Code compliant view, if you use the breaker as the only means of disconnect that would mean that the true disconnect means (in almost all cases) is remote from the paddle fan location. So, let's say that the paddle fan develops a problem and starts burning up and smoking. Do you want to have to go into the room and pull the control chain on the fan 4 times to shut it off or would you rather walk over to a wall switch to disconnect the power ? By the same token, would you want to walk a distance to wherever the breaker panel is and shut the breaker off that hopefully is marked "paddle fan(s)" ?
Now, getting back to the Code, wouldn't this section apply to this situation ? :
430.75 Disconnection.
(A) General. Motor control circuits shall be arranged so
that they will be disconnected from all sources of supply
when the disconnecting means is in the open position. The
disconnecting means shall be permitted to consist of two or
more separate devices, one of which disconnects the motor
and the controller from the source(s) of power supply for
the motor, and the other(s), the motor control circuit(s)
from its power supply. Where separate devices are used,
they shall be located immediately adjacent to each other.