You don't do it with an ohm meter. This is one way it is done.bryan said:I have a fluke meter with voltage,amp,ohms,and beep functions and I need to know how to check for a correct ground rod ohm reading . I have an amp clamp attachment with it.
bob said:You don't do it with an ohm meter. This is one way it is done.
http://www.kilowattclassroom.com/Archive/GndTestArticle.pdf#search=%22measure%20ground%20resistance%22
bryan said:I have a fluke meter with voltage,amp,ohms,and beep functions and I need to know how to check for a correct ground rod ohm reading . I have an amp clamp attachment with it.
jwelectric said:Would checking the amperage from a circuit tied to the electrode and doing Ohm's law work?
infinity said:It seems like it would but I don't think that this is an accepted standard method of testing. Years ago an old timer told me to disconnect the conductor that comes from the ground rod and put it on a 20 amp breaker. Now flip the CB on and read the current with an Amprobe. Do a little math and there you have it your ground rod resistance reading. No good huh?
The reading would only be an idication of the total return path and not just the earth resistance to the ground rod. And it would only indicate the current flow at that point in time under the particular conditions during the test.
dlhoule said:I don't see a point in doing tests of the ground rods, unless there are some major problems.
allenwayne said:Maybe I`m getting old and stupid.But if you took the grounding conductor off the ground rod and put it inline with an energized circuit with a cb inline there would be no load and the cb would trip out as designed to do.I know you didn`t say hook it up to an energized circuit but I fail to find the reason that a non energized breaker as opposed to an energized breaker would make a difference.
Now flip the CB on and read the current with an Amprobe.