Re: Choking a Ground Conductor
Originally posted by bennie: This choke effect started in a handbook by someone who pretended to be an expert, by fabricating something that is an insult to logic.
I don?t think so. The effect is real, though I will be quick to admit that the effect is most likely to be insignificant.
If you bond the conduit to the EGC at both ends of the conduit, then the two will operate as parallel resistances. The net resistance of the combination will be lower than the resistance of the conductor or the EGC alone. That would tend to increase the current flowing through the EGC. In a fault condition, that would be a good thing.
If you do not bond the conduit to the EGC, then the two will form both a capacitor and an inductor. There is capacitance between any two metal objects not in contact with each other. There is inductance between a wire and the conduit that surrounds it, as there is between two adjacent wires. The impact of the capacitance and inductance can only be to increase the total effective impedance of the EGC ? it cannot decrease it. Therefore, in the event of a fault, less current will flow in the EGC.
The bottom line: If you bond, it helps the EGC clear a fault. If you don?t bond, it hinders the EGC in its attempt to clear a fault.
How much of an issue is this
really? Well, probably not much. The amount of reactance added to the circuit depends on many physical factors. It would be hard to calculate for all possible combinations of diameters and lengths of conductors and conduits. The easiest way to avoid having to measure or calculate the impact is simply to forbid it. I equate that prohibition to the rule that says you can?t use electronic devices during take off or landing of a commercial aircraft. How many computers and CD players would it take, before a specific type of aircraft would experience any significant interference? Here?s the Airlines? answer: ?I don?t know, and I don?t want to spend the money to find out, so let?s just forbid it.? For my part, I find that approach reasonable.