peter d
Senior Member
- Location
- New England
I don't need prints because I am an electrical genius.
peter said:Celtic,
That drawing you showed is hideous. The scribling on it is illegible. There is no excuse for that since we now have CAD programs.
If an architect did that using AutoCad's "Cityline" font, the prints should be angrily returned to it with a harsh demand that they be corrected. There is no excuse for this garbage.
It's true George...I have mad crazy skillsGeorge Stolz said:Kinda hard to see through the duct tape, isn't it?stickboy1375 said:Not when you have "mad skills" :grin:
peter d said:I don't need prints because I am an electrical genius.
celtic said:Like Silent Bob?
peter d said:No, more on the order of Marc Shunk, but way better.
celtic said:My High School English Lit. teacher would ask the class about various interpretations of the various "great works".
More times than not, one of his favorite rebuttals was:
We are all entitled to our own faulty opinions.
JJWalecka said:Clean and manageable prints
Does anyone have a neat way of keeping prints clean and undamaged. I have used duct tape around the edges in the past. I recently tried clear tape but both were time consuming. I priced out $15.00 a page to be laminated. Any feedback is appreciated
JJ
Podagrower said:I "borrowed" a blueprint holder from my boss, the kind that clamps on the end to reinforce the stapled edge. I use that for my clean, office set. Then I barter with the other trades on the job to take the electrical drawings from their full sets for the grubby hands in the field(mine included).
480sparky said:You take the other trades' sets of E prints? Now wonder they don't care about your work... they don't know anything about it then!
If I have to look at the A, P, M, or whetever pages to find out what another trade is doing, I do so. Why take that option away from them? All you are doing is making easy for them to say, "Well, how am I supposed to know where you're running your 4" rigid?"