2#8 and #8 ground since all other options appear to be non code compliant
I agree too, your code reference would be 250.122(B)
Roger
Thanks for code there Roger.
I remembered this question as someone asked it recently....I wanted to link to it for the OP ~ but cannot find it.
Do you recall that thread?
Uh-oh. Prepare for a barrage of "Where does the NEC permit the EGC to be smaller than the BC conductors when using #10 or smaller?"B seems right to me
Uh-oh. Prepare for a barrage of "Where does the NEC permit the EGC to be smaller than the BC conductors when using #10 or smaller?"
Uh-oh. Prepare for a barrage of "Where does the NEC permit the EGC to be smaller than the BC conductors when using #10 or smaller?"
????. I think the poster is agreeing with the others.
Dennis, answer b was 2 #10's and 1 #12 EGC.
Chris
I thought the poster type 8 as in #8 wire-- better put the oculars on.![]()