"Common Path" / Bundling Limitations (ANSWERED, mostly)

Status
Not open for further replies.

burro

Member
I am posting this as a stand-alone post -- my original question did not show up -- might not have been approved since sounded too basic? Well, I think it is still a worthwhile question, so I'll post the answers I found -- sure most of us should know some of this, but I bet some of it is new to many of us. ;)



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The term "bundle" got me a lot further in the NEC Handbook, once I realized that's what I should be looking for. By the way, my situation is obviously SFR/residential.

I found a couple good links that tied a lot together for the scenarios I am inheriting:
A. http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080323180433AAM3Qa5
B. http://www.electricalknowledge.com/forum/archives/347.asp

Most of the following is drawn from those two references, with me double-checking 2008 NEC.

The reason for all this, as I imagined, is heat -- current running through magnetic fields ends up eddying (useful knowledge from my 4 years of grad physics), effectively increasing the resistivity/impedance, and therefore increasing the heat generation.

MAIN POINTS:

0. The main NEC references are
a. Heat and amperage de-rating:
NEC Tables 310.16, & 310.15 (B)(2)(a)]
NEC Sections 303, and 310.15
(Section 310.15(b)(2) contains the 24-inch limitation -- apparently unlimited wires can be bundled for 23 inches.)
b. Pipe-fill:
NEC Chapter 9, Tables 1-4.

1. The ABS thing is a BIG no-no -- ABS and PVC (white/black plastic) are no good -- only listed raceways such as Schedule 40 Rigid Nonmetallic Conduit (the grey stuff) are OK. [See NEC 110.3(B)].

2. NM-B is rated at 194 degrees F. (See notes on cladding of individual conductors, under external sheathing.) It must not be operated at a temperature higher than the listed temperature of the raceway [NEC 352.12 (E)].

3. We are allowed a pipe-fill of 40% of that area, or 0.794 Sq. In. [See NEC Chapter 9, Tables 1 & 4].

4. To find the cross sectional area of the Type NM cable (?Romex?), [see NEC Chapter 9, Table 1, Note 9]: You must use the major dimension of the elliptical cable as the diameter for each cable assembly.

(From link A, On 12-2 the major dimension is 15/32?. That means that you must use 15/64 as your radius when calculating the area of each cable assembly. 15 divided by 64 equals 0.2344. That is your radius; 3.1416 (PI) X 0.055 (.2344 squared) = 0.173. ==> If you have 7 conductors in a 1.5-inch pipe, then the total pipe fill area of the wires is 0.173 X 7 = 1.211 Sq. In. verses the allowable fill 0.794 Sq. In.)

5. Also see the Ambient Temperature adjustment factors [at the bottom of NEC Table 310.16]. E.g. if you are running this conduit into an attic, further derating is probably required; if the attic temperature ever exceeds 122 degrees F - not unusual in a lot of the US - [NEC section 352.12 (D)] does not allow RNC, unless it is listed for higher temperatures.

6. Don't use plumbers glue on the fittings.

7. Re expansion fittings for conduit -- Take NEC Chapter 9 Table 2 into consideration when bending RNC with an approved method (not heating with a propane torch, for example); when installed in long, straight runs, you should also check NEC 352.44 and NEC Table 352.44(A) to determine the need for expansion fittings.

8. Removing the cladding from the wires running through the raceway is a BAD idea and will make things worse if any wire heats up.

9. If more than two NM cables pass through a hole that is to be fire or draft stopped, then you have to derate [according to NEC Table 310.15(B)(2)(a)] (fairly new addition).

10. "If you exceed approximate values listed then you should consider calculating for voltage drop. If you stay within these distances then voltage drop should not be a concern on a general rule. 150 feet for 125 volts or 250 feet for 240 volt or 600 feet for 480 volt." [no cit., from unchecked source].


A couple more links with discussions of bundling scenarios and de-ratings, etc.:
http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_...n-commercial-inspection/8005-romex-attic.html
http://www.diychatroom.com/showthread.php?t=10123
http://forums.mikeholt.com/archive/index.php/t-101277.html
http://www.electricalknowledge.com/forum/topic.asp?whichpage=0.55&TOPIC_ID=6461&#51510
http://www.nachi.org/forum/archive/index.php/t-21279.html



Remaining questions --
1. What is the required separation (if *any*) for nm-b romex stapled side-by-side?
2. Likewise, can holes through 2x4s, etc, e.g. carrying 1-2 romex 12-2 wires each, be arbitrarily close together (that seems silly to me, since magnetic fields go through wood about the same as they go through air)?

Thanks, folks,

~Louie.
 
burro said:
Remaining questions --
1. What is the required separation (if *any*) for nm-b romex stapled side-by-side?

There are no requirements for separation side by side

burro said:
2. Likewise, can holes through 2x4s, etc, e.g. carrying 1-2 romex 12-2 wires each, be arbitrarily close together (that seems silly to me, since magnetic fields go through wood about the same as they go through air)?

Thanks, folks,

~Louie.
I believe they are concerned here with heat buildup not magnetic fields. Remember the 2 wires in a hole only needs derating if the holes are to be fire caulked, etc 334.80

Also since the wire in NM is 90C then it would take more than 4 NM cables before derating would be a problem. 4 cables usually means 8 CCC. The derate factor for 8 ccc is 70%. Let's say we are using 12/2nm. #12 is good for 30 amps (90C) so 70% of 30 is 21 amps. We are still good. If we have 5 cables(10 CCC) we will have issues here.
 
Thanks Mike -- especially for the extra code refs!!

Dennis Alwon said:
I believe they are concerned here with heat buildup not magnetic fields.
I agree. Magnetic fields may or may not be a factor. Magnetic fields from adjacent wires *could* affect resistivity, leading to increased temperatures. More adjacent wires would increase magnetic fields, leading to more heat per amperage draw. Not sure how large a factor that is. Could be small and that code just cares about allowing adequate space for heat to dissipate non-destructively. But code is code, whatever my guesses may be, I suppose!

Thanks, again!
~Louie.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top