But you would have room for more at a larger size due to needed adjustments.
Today I learned larger conduits have more room.![]()
And your day complete.Today I learned larger conduits have more room.![]()
Right, how many more circuits you can run is not as simple as it may seem though.Today I learned larger conduits have more room.![]()
9 #12 thhn cc conductors are installed in 3/4" emt and protected with 20A breakers. If the emt was 1.5" for example would that still be the max amount of conductors that could be installed for that scenario? Thanks
In the late 20th century era on into the early 21st the magic number is Nine CCCs for fifteen or twenty amp circuits. Works out for single phase and three phase. I don't know if that was planned or serendipitous.Nine #12 CCCs on a 20A OCPD in any size pipe would be in violation of NEC. #12 Cu has ampacity of 25A [NEC310.15(B)(16)]. 310.15(B)(2)(a) calls for 70% derating for 7 through 9 CCCs, which leaves you with 17.5 amps.
EDIT: This is assuming you are using the 75 degree column.
In the late 20th century era on into the early 21st the magic number is Nine CCCs for fifteen or twenty amp circuits. Works out for single phase and three phase. I don't know if that was planned or serendipitous.
Not old enough to be a Beatles fan I guess.Oh, I wasn't familiar with the magic number table in the NEC :lol:
Nine #12 CCCs on a 20A OCPD in any size pipe would be in violation of NEC. #12 Cu has ampacity of 25A [NEC310.15(B)(16)]. 310.15(B)(2)(a) calls for 70% derating for 7 through 9 CCCs, which leaves you with 17.5 amps.
EDIT: This is assuming you are using the 75 degree column.
See 110.14(C) as to where you start your ampacity adjustment from.Nine #12 CCCs on a 20A OCPD in any size pipe would be in violation of NEC. #12 Cu has ampacity of 25A [NEC310.15(B)(16)]. 310.15(B)(2)(a) calls for 70% derating for 7 through 9 CCCs, which leaves you with 17.5 amps.
EDIT: This is assuming you are using the 75 degree column.
110.14 is for terminations though, the conductors are still able to be adjusted from their 90 deg values (unless they are indeed 75 deg conductors). Final size of conductor selected however can not be smaller then whatever size the 60 or 75 degree terminals call for.See 110.14(C) as to where you start your ampacity adjustment from.
Roger
And where do you find this allowance?the conductors are still able to be adjusted from their 90 deg values (unless they are indeed 75 deg conductors).
Are we on the same page? I expect someone like you already knows this but maybe we are not talking about the same thing here causing some confusion.And where do you find this allowance?
Roger
Yes it is, read 110.14(C)It is not exactly stated in one simple sentence in one code section.
Conductors with temperature ratings higher than specified for terminations shall be permitted to be used for ampacity adjustment, correction, or both.
Which is what 110.14(C) is saying310.15 applies to the conductors - we make adjustments from 90 degree values if we have 90 degree insulation.
Yes it does.That gets us back to what was mentioned about 110.14
Ok, 110.14 doesn't tell you how to make ampacity adjustments just that you can make them to the conductor. There is no adjusting the terminal, you will always have a conductor with a minimum size no smaller then the termination calls for, you can adjust the conductor ampacity as it applies to it's insulation, so you are starting (which that word start is what triggered my first reply) with the 90 degree column in the ampacity table as it relates to insulation not to the terminal that is likely only 60 or 75 degrees.Yes it is, read 110.14(C)
Which is what 110.14(C) is saying
Yes it does.
I was just wondering what the point was to post #15
Roger
sorry for any confusion.