Confused on electrical drawings. 208V single pole on 280V/120 panel?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Elecestim123

Member
Location
MN
Occupation
Electrical Estimator
Trying to understand if I'm missing something, or if the engineer has something wrong.

On the set of drawings I'm working on now for an estimate, the equipment schedule states to provide 208V, single phase/SINGLE POLE (20/1 breaker) power to some equipment. The equipment is fed from a 208/120V panel. On the panel schedule in this panel, phases A,B, C are supplying loads as normal for 120V/208V throughout, including 3 phase 208V.

How would 208V be fed from a single pole (20/1) breaker in this case?

Trying to remember back to my electrical theory days, I know there's such thing as a Delta High Leg system, but isn't that a 240V system that can also supply 208V and 120V? And typically the high leg would be the "B" phase or "C phase I believe. So from any phases to any other phase, I get 240V. If I go from high leg to neutral, I get 208V. If I go from neutral to any phase (besides the high leg), I get 120V.

But that can't be the system being used in this case, because both B and C phases in the panelboard schedule are shown supplying 120V equipment/receptacles. So, if the Engineer designed off a Delta High Leg system, I could see how I can get 208V single pole. But this can't be Delta High Leg configuration because of the 120V I mentioned above.

Otherwise is there such thing as a 208V Delta High Leg system, or does Delta High Leg only come in 240V?

Therefore I'm struggling to understand how I could get 208V off 1 pole as the panelboard shows for equipment, as opposed to it being 2-pole. If the engineer has it wrong that's obviously going to shake things up quite a But. Just want to understand before I bring any points up to the Engineer/Vendors

Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited:
Does your vendor have an opinion on this? I would bring it up.
I'll ask them tomorrow. Just wanted to make sure I wasn't misunderstanding/missing something before I mentioned it. Didn't want to look stupid by not remembering some theory I should know.
 
Im guessing its a typo. Should read "single phase/DOUBLE POLE (20/2 breaker)".
In the panel schedule it only shows it on 1 phase. So I'm thinking it was actually intentional. The mechanical schedule shows the equipment as 208V single phase, so I'm thinking the engineer wasn't thinking and just assumed/treated it as single POLE?
 
There is obviously a mistake somewhere. Assuming the mechanical schedule is correct, that will dictate what needs to be done.
 
In the panel schedule it only shows it on 1 phase. So I'm thinking it was actually intentional. The mechanical schedule shows the equipment as 208V single phase, so I'm thinking the engineer wasn't thinking and just assumed/treated it as single POLE?
There is obviously a mistake somewhere. Assuming the mechanical schedule is correct, that will dictate what needs to be done.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top