dedicated electrical space

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: dedicated electrical space

Originally posted by lesliek:
300.8 Installation of Conductors with Other Systems. Raceways or cable trays containing electrical conductors shall not contain any pipe, tube, or equal for steam, water, air, gas, drainage or any service other than electrical.
This is the definition of a raceway from the 2005 code.
Raceway. An enclosed channel of metal or nonmetallic
materials designed expressly for holding wires, cables, or bus bars, with additional functions as permitted in this Code........ect.

I don't think a wall cavity falls under the definition of a raceway.
 
Re: dedicated electrical space

AH! the site that got me to register. This is a plumbing wall,most likely. Anywhere from 5.5"-6.5" in depth to work with. Panel & footprint are 3.5" in depth. Water pipe is .5-.75" leaving approx. an extra 1.5" left over behind the panel. How else would you reasonably get the pipe from 24" up to 70" approx. in that space. Don't answer that. Experience. Both rooms have plumbing. 4" OD pipe up wall. Not damp. Not raceway. I hope this helps (in the right direction).
 
Re: dedicated electrical space

4" OD pipe not in that space,so it does not spur another tangent. :) :) :)

[ January 01, 2006, 01:35 AM: Message edited by: Fred S. ]
 
Re: dedicated electrical space

Question: How thick is the wall? For plumbing here a common practice is 2x8s or even 2 seperate 2x4 walls.

edit: Fred beat me to it

[ January 01, 2006, 01:49 PM: Message edited by: DaveTap ]
 
Re: dedicated electrical space

I gave a complete and thorough list of citations 2005 NEC as to why I made my conculsion. The wall discussed on the otherside mention of SHOWER HEAD, etc. Please review the my post completely, I also aready explained why the cavity, (thru plumbing for showerhead and controls on a WASHED WALL, therefore the wall is NOT continuous TILE, concrete exception, presence of water pipes, i.e. condensation potential as well, temperature differences of same, thereby adding to condensation issues - entry of steam, water vapor, etc. into cavity space containing panel, etc.) therefore the logical conclusion that the Code does not permit same. i.e. no plumbing or foreign system may share cavity containing FLUSH MOUNTED panel as described, the panel must be RAISED and may NOT share the same cavity space. The installation as described would not in compliance with NEC 2005 for several reasons, the pipe's presence aside for a moment, the wall on the otherside being a washed wall, would have to be continuous floor to above from stud to stud tile or concrete, as per reference higher up in original list.
 
Re: dedicated electrical space

The NEC does not consider a panel on the opposite side of a wall that is common to a shower to be a damp location no mater how many citations you try to assign to it.

If it was a damp location would you be able to insulate it and use standard wood studs?

You need to 'adjust your thinking accordingly' :D
 
Re: dedicated electrical space

iwire:

Opposite exterior side of a WALL is one thing, a box containing a panel installed within a wall cavity is something else. Especially as the original post describes the plumbing serving a shower-head and related plumbing within this wall CAVITY. Therefore it does, see complete citations list referenced. A shower WALL is frequently WASHED (the cascade of water falling upon same during operation of SHOWER, it is similarly washed during CLEANING of same with caustic, acidic and other corrosive to electrical systems chemicals, often rinsed yet again (washed) with clear water to neutralize same. Generally controls for a SHOWER HEAD, assuming its penetration to the back side of this wall cavity is ABOVE SIX FEET, are often by practical experience, and a HOST OF other related model plumbing, building, etc. codes, accessible from a height of far-less than SIX FEET. The presence of the shower wall on the backside of this wall cavity and ESPECIALLY the presence of foreign systems in same - preclude the use of a cut-out/cabinet containing electrical system panel board installed WITHIN same. Wall mount if applicable or offset 1/2 in. is required of the panel box from the WALL, not within the wall cavity. I have already cited where the NEC defines this.

"Does the article 110.26(F)(1) pertain to foreign systems inside a wall cavity. I have a house with a recessed panel that opens out to a kitchen. It shares a wall with a bathroom. The original installers put the shower head and other assorted plumbing in this same bay as the panel. Is this legal. I thought at first it was, but I'm having seconded thoughts.....would really like to make sure thanks."

Answer to poster: YES it applies, furthermore any electrical equipment must be protected as per list provided previously.

110.26(F) Dedicated Equipment Space. All switchboards, panel-boards, distribution boards, and motor control centers shall be located in dedicated spaces and protected from damage.
110.26(F)(1) Indoor. Indoor installations shall comply with 110.26(F)(1)(a) through (F)(1)(d).
110.26(F)(1)(a) Dedicated Electrical Space. The space equal to the width and depth of the equipment and extending from the floor to a height of 1.8m (6 ft) above the equipment or to the structural ceiling, whichever is lower, shall be dedicated to the electrical installation. No piping, ducts, leak protection apparatus, or other equipment foreign to the electrical installation shall be located in this zone.
110.26(F)(1)(b) Foreign systems. The area above the dedicated space required by 110.26(F)(1)(a) shall be permitted to contain foreign systems, provided protection is installed to avoid damage to the electrical equipment from condensation, leaks, or breaks in such foreign systems.

Note: there is no provision for an exception for foreign systems to be adjacent to the area of dedicated electrical space defined by 110.26(F)(1)(a). (1)(a) and (1)(b) are simply to provide for that area that may exist above 6 ft but below the ceiling WHEN PROTECTION has been installed at/above this 6 ft clearance, that that area above SAME may be used/contain foreign systems. If there is no "structural ceiling" the limit is 6 feet. If the wall partition sole plate is upon STRUCTURAL FLOOR, the "new floor" for the "space" begins at the top of the plate.

I fear that Charlie B made 2 essential errors when he said: "110.26(A)(1) tells me that for an enclosed panel (like the one under discussion), the working space begins at the front of the panel, not the back.
110.26(A)(1)(a) tells me that I don't need working space on the sides of this panel.
From these two, I infer that the pipes are not within the required working space.
110.26(F)(1)(a) tells me that the space directly above and below the panel (but not necessarily to the side of the panel), from floor to ceiling (including within the wall, since the panel is recessed), cannot have pipes.
From this I infer that the water pipe for the shower head can run vertically, from floor to the height of the shower head, within the wall cavity and to the side of the panel. The fact that this may take away room that you might want to use for future conduits means nothing.
I conclude that this is code compliant."

One being failing to consider ALL of Section I of Article 110 in its entirety, especially 110.1, 110.3, 110.11, and 110.12 in his interpretation of this issue; and the second being what 110.26 Spaces About Electrical Equipment. actually says, which is: "Sufficient access and working space shall be provided and maintained about all electric equipment to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment...."

Edited to correct consitant keystroke errors when meaning to refer to 110.26 and typed 110.36 in error (kept missing the "2").

[ January 01, 2006, 08:35 PM: Message edited by: lesliek ]
 
Re: dedicated electrical space

Originally posted by jbwhite:
Originally posted by lesliek:
300.8 Installation of Conductors with Other Systems. Raceways or cable trays containing electrical conductors shall not contain any pipe, tube, or equal for steam, water, air, gas, drainage or any service other than electrical.
This is the definition of a raceway from the 2005 code.
Raceway. An enclosed channel of metal or nonmetallic
materials designed expressly for holding wires, cables, or bus bars, with additional functions as permitted in this Code........ect.

I don't think a wall cavity falls under the definition of a raceway.
Then I suggest you keep reading jb....

"Raceway: An enclosed channel of metal or nonmetallic materials designed expressly for holding wires, cables, or
busbars, with additional functions as permitted in this Code. Raceways include, but are not limited to, rigid metal conduit, rigid non-metalic conduit., intermediate metal conduit, liquidtight flexible conduit, flexible metallic tubing, flexible metal conduit, electrical nonmetallic tubing, electrical metallic tubing, underfloor raceways, cellular concrete floor raceways, cellular metal floor raceways, surface raceways, WIREWAYS and busways.

Suggest you think about your favorite stated wiring method -- NM cable. The definition stated in article 100 is NOT all-encompasing.

[ January 01, 2006, 09:12 PM: Message edited by: lesliek ]
 
Re: dedicated electrical space

lesliek I see you are a "GC residential rehab/remodel".

I have no idea how that qualifies you to 'interpret' the NEC but so far you are way off the mark.

The fact that you feel a stud cavity is a 'raceway' speaks volumes about your understanding of basic NEC rules.

I suggest you hang out and learn a few more things about the NEC as you do not understand it now.
 
Re: dedicated electrical space

Originally posted by lesliek:
Raceway: An enclosed channel of metal or nonmetallic materials designed expressly for holding wires, cables, or...
I never realized stud bays, (wall cavities) are designed expressly for holding wires, cables, etc... :roll:

Roger

[ January 02, 2006, 06:19 AM: Message edited by: roger ]
 
Re: dedicated electrical space

Raceways are manufactured items, not wall cavities. They are listed, but not limited to the "manufactured types" in the definition.

Otherwise, all wall cavities could (and probably would) contain open conductors such as THHN.

Your analysis of Art 110 is quite unique. Where do you actually work? Do you attend any meetings or go to code classes? Or do you strictly interpret the code on your own?


Your musing is good though, as it helps to keep our understanding of code writing keen.
 
Re: dedicated electrical space

Originally posted by pierre:
Otherwise, all wall cavities could (and probably would) contain open conductors such as THHN.
I would say that would be a big yes. :D
 
Re: dedicated electrical space

Originally posted by lesliek:
Suggest you think about your favorite stated wiring method -- NM cable. The definition stated in article 100 is NOT all-encompasing.
Leslie, a cable is not a raceway. You can install wires in a raceway; how do you install wires in a cable? Can I watch? :D

Bob's right about the "frequently washed walls" bit. I've never seen a shower stall with solely drywall holding the water from the interior of the wall. There is always a prefab stall or tile turning the water away. Therefore, the interior of the wall won't be damp unless there's a serious problem.

110.26(A)(1)(b) makes it clear that although the area is normally a dry location, the writers of the NEC are acutely aware that foreign systems can go bad, and condensate, leak or break. That's the issue.
 
Re: dedicated electrical space

Originally posted by don_resqcapt19:
Ryan, Pierre,
This section needs some work as it actually prohibits the installation of recessed panles.
-
While the section goes on to prohibit some specific items the rule is general in nature. It applies to things other than those specified, as shown by the exception for suspended ceilings. The top plate of the wall is not the structural ceiling and it is in the required dedicated space making it impossible to install a recessed panel.
Don
I'm having trouble understanding this. The bottom plate of the wall is troubling this section, but I can't see how the top plate is violating this.

Then again, I don't think I've ever really read this section. :(
 
Re: dedicated electrical space

Originally posted by georgestolz:
I'm having trouble understanding this. The bottom plate of the wall is troubling this section, but I can't see how the top plate is violating this.
The bottom plate is not the floor, it is a component of the wall system.

The space equal to the width and depth of the equipment and extending from the floor

The top plate is not the structural ceiling it is again a component of the wall system

to a height of 1.8 m (6 ft) above the equipment or to the structural ceiling, whichever is lower
 
Re: dedicated electrical space

Originally posted by iwire:
The top plate is not the structural ceiling it is again a component of the wall system

to a height of 1.8 m (6 ft) above the equipment or to the structural ceiling, whichever is lower
Even a non-load-bearing wall contributes some structural support of the ceiling, even if it's minimal.

But let's imagine a bearing wall: The top plate of the wall is necessary to the ceiling, or it would fall. So is it too far a stretch to state that the top plate of the wall is part of the structural ceiling?

We look at it and say "wall" but who's to say the wall doesn't start 3" lower? :D

-George
Devil's Advocate :D
 
Re: dedicated electrical space

Originally posted by georgestolz:
We look at it and say "wall" but who's to say the wall doesn't start 3" lower? :D

-George
Devil's Advocate :D
Well Ozzy :D

Certain items are predetermined to be part of certain systems.

The ceiling will remain with or without the top or bottom wall plates. The wall on the other hand is tough to build without plates although I am sure we have all seen it done by DIYs.
:D
 
Re: dedicated electrical space

Are we taking votes? Well I will vote anyway.

I would say that the sole plate and the top plate are not part of the ceiling or floor, but part of the wall. It is probably a good thing that I don't do allot of residential work, but if you have ever seen me drill, you would not call either structural after I was done drilling and installing nail plates. :D

There are, however, still a few bits of wood left behind that could be considered as being in the window for the panel's dedicated space.
 
Re: dedicated electrical space

I like George's idea. If the top plate is structural ceiling then IMHO so is the lower plate. How else could you hold up the top plate?

So, can we put our switchboard in the ceiling? :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top