hurk27
Senior Member
- Location
- Portage, Indiana NEC: 2008
My only point is that there is no evidence that a 20-ohm grounding system is any safer than a 100-ohm or even higher system...
I would guess there are millions of structures with grounding systems well above the magical 25-ohm threshold that have never been exposed to a hazard that could have been reduced or eliminated with a lower resistance grounding system.
And at the same time, there are probably millions of Lightning Protection Systems and other grounding systems that are completely successful with relatively high grounding resistance...
My thoughts exactly, and the results of this thread:
http://forums.mikeholt.com/showthread.php/116358-Earth-Shells-Experiment-time-to-eat-crow!
I see requirements for ground rods all the time, and in most all cases are not based upon any kind of scientific evaluation, but are put in the requirements just because thats what been done for so many years, now this is not talking about true lightning protection systems, or ground planes for broadcast radio, or short wave antennas, which are of a whole different design and effect.
Some of the books I was studying from my Ramsay test had instructional chapters identifying the purpose of grounding electrodes as for the safety from shock hazards, and even had questions and answers to the same effect, it even in one place stated that it is for the operation of OCPD, and of course we know the difference (or should) there are many from all walks of life who don't, including engineers who put these requirements into their design thinking they have done something to make the world a safer place, when we know this is false.
I don't know how the change this kind of thinking, but I try when ever the opportunity come up.