babool
Member
- Location
- Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Does anyone know the demand factor used to calculate the service size for multiple car charging stations, 10-20 unit range?
Last edited by a moderator:
I have no experience nor NEC knowledge of your setup however, as a practical means:
~~ some a hole will double park his minivan or sports car, relegating two of those spaces into paperweights.
~~ three people will illegally park there. They do not have electric vehicles.
~~ with the 5 of 10 of remaining spaces, you might actually get 5 electric vehicles that need to charge all at the same time.
I agree.I don't disagree but can't help but think of the multiple charging stations we have in this area with underbrush now growing in some of the charging spots. Another year, the only way all spots will be in use is if someone brings a chain-saw.
As I said, I think that will remain so - at least in the near future.I suspect there are no such factors available. I think the reason is that they could all be in use at the same time even though they are rarely used at all, at least around here.
And they are rated at 13A here.the problem with electric cars has always been the recharge cycle.
basically a gallon of gas has 100,000 btus in it. at 33% efficiency it is about 10 kwH of useful energy at the wheels.
to get 10 kwH out of a 230V wall socket takes almost an hour at almost 50 Amps.
And they are rated at 13A here.
Kinda puts it in perspective when you have a 40kWh to charge.13A X 230V = a little less than 3 kw-hr per hour. Or about the equivalent of < 1/3 gallon of gas.
Kinda puts it in perspective when you have a 40kWh to charge.
Around 300A I thinkIt is almost like they want electric cars to fail if this is the best charging option available.
Tesla has a 73 kw charger option for one of its cars. but it takes 70 + Amps at 240V. Not very many dwellings have that kind of service capability left over.
Around 300A I think
But there is another, perhaps more serious, consideration here.
If most people went for EVs the whole electrical infrastructure would have to be upgraded. Generation, transmission, distribution at all levels.
This is an issue seldom confronted by those who promote the merits of EVs.
Please understand that I'm not anti EVs and the prospect of reduced pollution. I just think we need to look at the whole picture.
Taxing EVs for their externalities is appropriate if we also tax gasoline cars for their externalities, i.e. air pollution. Until that happens, providing subsidies like the federal tax credit and reduced taxes on EVs is an another way to address the problem.Most people who buy EVs do it for the advantage of not paying the taxes that are tacked onto gasoline and diesel fuels. I can guarantee you that that will change if EVs become popular enough to put a dent in the road use and other taxes. Government is very good at taxing things and I can see an EV tax and a mileage tax.